期刊文献+

基于假设检验的地震动强度(烈度)速报方法 被引量:18

A hypothesis testing based method for seismic intensity rapid assessment by strong ground motion parameters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地震发生后数分钟内,快速、可靠地判别出地震动强度(烈度)的空间分布,用以估计不同地区的受灾程度,可以为政府开展应急救援并合理分配救援力量提供决策依据,保证救援人员及时、准确地到达极震区并展开搜救,以减少生命财产损失。本文基于统计学中的假设检验方法,对历史震害资料进行统计,提出了一种利用强地震动参数判别地震动强度(烈度)的方法。比较结果表明,本方法所确定的地震动强度(烈度)与实际震害烈度对应较好,能较真实地反映实际震害情况。 That the distribution of earthquake damage could be reliably estimated within several minutes after a big earthquake, would be very important for the government to make emergent response in time and to distribute the rescue forces to the seismic areas, which could mitigate the loss of lives and properties in the most efficient way. Intensity rapid assessment is also very useful for public information, loss estimation, earthquake planning, and post-earthquake engineering and scientific analyses. Based on the hypothesis testing in statistics and actual seismic intensity data of three big historic earthquakes in California, a method of estimating seismic intensity rapidly by strong ground motion parameters is presented in the article. Comparisons indicate that this method is more reliable to establish the relationship between strong ground motion parameters and seismic intensities, which show the different degrees of earthquake damage. This method has already been used in Ground Motion Fast Reporting Program in China's Mainland.
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期49-54,共6页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 中国地震局工程力学研究所中央级公益性研究所基本科研专项(2007C02) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAC13B02-0202)
关键词 地震动强度(烈度) 假设检验 强地震动参数 震害 seismic intensity hypothesis testing strong ground motion parameter earthquake damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1袁一凡.由地震动三要素确定地震动强度(烈度)的研究[R].哈尔滨:国家地震局工程力学研究所,1998:1-51.
  • 2David J Wald, et al. ShakeMap manual [ M]. Reston, VA: USGS, 2006 : 1 - 156.
  • 3David J Wald, et al. TriNet "ShakeMaps" : Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in Southern California [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1999, 15(3) : 537 -555.
  • 4David J Wald, et al. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California [ J ] Earthquake Spectra, 1999, 15 (3) : 557 - 564.
  • 5Sokolov V Yu,Chernov Yu K. On the correlation of seismic intensity with fourier amplitude spectra [ J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1998, 14(4) : 679 - 694.
  • 6Boatwright J. Thywissen K. Seekins L C. Correlation of Ground Motion and Intensity for the 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2001, 91 (4) : 739 -752.
  • 7Shabestari K T, Yamazaki F. A proposal of instrumental seismic intensity scale compatible with MMI evaluated from three-component acceleration records [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2001, 17(4) : 711 -723.
  • 8Karim K R, Yamazaki F. Correlation of JMA instrumental seismic intensity with strong motion parameters [ J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31:1191 -1212.
  • 9Kuwata Y, Takada S. instantaneous instrumental seismic intensity and evacuation [J]. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2002, 24 ( 1 ) : 35 - 42.
  • 10Wu Yih-Min, et al. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and intensity in Taiwan [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2003, 93( 1 ) : 386 -396.

共引文献4

同被引文献189

引证文献18

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部