期刊文献+

非增强MRI、静态和动态对比增强MRI预测脊柱压缩性骨折良、恶性的Logistic回归分析 被引量:6

Logistic regression analysis of non-enhanced MR imaging,static and dynamic enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy of vertebral compression fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价非增强磁共振成像(Magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)、静态增强MRI和动态对比增强MRI对脊柱良、恶性压缩性骨折的鉴别诊断价值并确定不同检查方法中预测脊柱压缩性骨折良、恶性的最主要的MRI征象。方法:经临床和(或)病理组织证实的胸、腰椎体骨质疏松伴椎体急性压缩性骨折(Acute comtression fracture,ACF)43例(71个椎体)和胸、腰椎体恶性压缩性骨折(Malignant comtression fracture,MCF)49例(99个椎体)行非增强、钆剂T1WI静态和动态对比增强MR检查。以脊柱压缩性骨折的良、恶性作为因变量,各种MRI征象为自变量因素分别采用非增强MR(I模型1)、非增强MRI联合静态增强MRI(模型2)以及非增强MRI、静态增强MRI征象联合动态对比增强MR(I模型3)对脊柱压缩性骨折良、恶性的预测效果进行二值多元Logistic回归分析。不同的模型对脊柱压缩性骨折良、恶性预测的敏感性、特异性及准确性采用受试者操作特性曲线(Receiver operating characteristic,ROC)分析。结果:单因素分析结果显示:椎体T1WI信号均匀性、椎体后缘膨隆、椎体后上角后凸、椎弓根改变、硬膜外软组织肿块、椎旁软组织改变、椎体强化模式、椎旁软组织强化模式、椎体动态增强开始时间、时间信号强度曲线(Time-intensity curve,TIC)类型共10个征象在脊柱良、恶性压缩性骨折组间的差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05),椎体T2WI信号均匀性、椎体内液体征象、压缩椎体形态、椎间盘改变共4个征象在脊柱良、恶性压缩性骨折组间的差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。ROC分析结果显示:非增强MRI、静态增强MRI联合动态对比增强MRI预测脊柱压缩性骨折良、恶性的效果优于非增强MRI或非增强MRI联合静态增强MRI,其诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为81.6%、90.7%和85.9%。Logistic回归分析结果显示:椎弓根改变、椎体强化模式以及TIC类型是预测脊柱压缩性骨折良、恶性的最主要的影响因素(OR值分别为3.558,4.666和0.007,P值均<0.05)。结论:非增强MRI、静态增强MRI联合动态对比增强MRI可以提高脊柱良、恶性压缩性骨折的鉴别诊断能力。 Objective:To evaluate non-enhanced MR imaging,static and dynamic enhanced MR imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures and to evaluate which MR imaging parameters are most predictive of malignancy.Methods:Non-enhanced MR imaging,static and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging were performed on 43 patients with acute osteoporotic compression fracture and 49 patients with malignant compression fracture proved by clinical follow-up and/or histologic findings.Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the best combination of MR imaging parameters that might be predictive of malignancy.Subjective overall performance of diagnostic models for sensitivity,specificity and accuracy was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC).Results:Univariate analysis showed that the frequency distribution of MR imaging parameters including T1 weighted imaging homogeneity of vertebrae,convex posterior of vertebrae,retropulsion of the posterosuperior angle of vertebrae,pedicle involvement,epidural soft tissue mass,paravertebral soft tissue lesions,pattern of enhancement of vertebrae,pattern of enhancement of paravertebral soft tissue lesions,start of dynamic enhancement and pattern of time-intensity curve(TIC) were different between benign and malignant compression fracture(P〈0.05).However,T2 weighted imaging homogeneity of vertebrae,fluid sign,shape of vertebral collapse and intervertebral discinvolvement were not different between benign and malignant compression fracture(P〉0.05).ROC analysis showed that combined non-enhanced,static and dynamic enhanced MR imaging parameters(model 3) were superior to non-enhanced MR imaging parameter(smodel 1)iction of malignancy.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of model 3 were 81.6%,90.7% and 85.9%,respectively.Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the most discriminating parameters were pedicle involvement,pattern of enhancement of vertebrae and pattern of TIC(OR value were 3.558,4.666 and 0.007,respectively,P〈0.05).Conclusion:Non-enhanced MR imaging combined with static and dynamic enhanced MR imaging can improve the differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fracture.
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 2008年第10期1208-1213,共6页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
关键词 脊柱 骨折 回归分析 磁共振 对比增强 Spine Fracture Regression analysis Magnetic resonance Contrast enhancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Uetani M,Hashmi R,Hayashi K. Malignant and benign compression fractures:differentiation and diagnostic pitfalls on MRI[J]. Clinical Radiology, 2004,59 ( 2 ) : 124-131.
  • 2Baur A,Stbler A,Arbogast S,et al. Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures:fluid sign at MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 2002,225 ( 3 ) : 730-735.
  • 3王飞,陆建平,王莉,刘崎.椎体压缩性骨折的磁共振诊断[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2003,9(1):46-50. 被引量:9
  • 4Shih TT,Huang KM,Li YW. Solitary vertebral collapse:distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns[J]. J Magn Resort Imaging, 1999,9(5) :635-642.
  • 5史大鹏,窦社伟,陈传亮,李旭民,刘秋明.脊柱原发性骨质疏松椎体压缩的MRI表现[J].中华放射学杂志,1998,32(11):768-770. 被引量:17
  • 6Cuenod CA,Laredo JD,Chevret S,et al. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy:appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images[J]. Radiology, 1996,199(2 ) : 541-549.
  • 7Scherer A,Wittsack HJ,Strupp C,et al. Vertebral fractures in multiple myeloma:first results of assessment of fracture risk using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Ann Hematol, 2002,81 ( 9 ) : 517-521.
  • 8Chen WT,Shih TT,Chen RC,et al. Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI:in compar ison with compression fraeture and metastasis[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 15 (3) : 308-314.
  • 9Tokuda O,Hayashi N,Taguchi K,et al. Dynamic contrast-enhan ced perfusion MR imaging of diseased vertebrae:analysis of three parameters and the distribution of the time-intensity curve patterns [J]. Skeletal Radiol,2005,34(10):632-663.
  • 10Hawighorst H,Libicher M,Knopp MV,et al. Evaluation of angiogenesis and perfusion of bone marrow lesions:role of semiquanti tative and quantitative dynamic MRI[J]. J Magn Reson hnaging, 1999,10 ( 3 ) : 286-294.

二级参考文献12

  • 1[1]An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C, et al. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging?Spine 1995; 20: 1776~ 1782
  • 2[2]Rupp RE, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor. Spine 1995; 20:2499~ 2503
  • 3[3]Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, et al. Diffusion - weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 948 ~ 953
  • 4[4]Baur A, Huber A, Ertl- Wagner B, et al. Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady - state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 366 ~ 372
  • 5[5]Moulopoulos LA, Yoshimitsu K , Johnston DA , et al. MR prediction of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:667 ~ 674
  • 6[6]Cuenod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, et al. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy:appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium- enhanced MR images. Radiology 1996; 199:541 ~ 549
  • 7[7]Shih TT, Huang KM, Li YW, et al. Solitary vertebral collapse: distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 635~ 642
  • 8[8]Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Maldague BE, et al. Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma. Part I. Distribution and ppearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 204: 195~ 199
  • 9[9]Kim HJ, Ryu KN, Choi WS, et al. Spinal involvement of hematopoietic malignancies and metastasis: differentiation using MR imaging. Clin Imaging 1999; 23:125 ~ 133
  • 10陈星荣,全身CT和MRI,1994年,750页

共引文献59

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部