期刊文献+

惊恐障碍患者抑制性控制缺陷的事件相关电位研究 被引量:5

Inhibitory control deficit in patients with panic disorder: an event.related potentials study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨惊恐障碍患者抑制性控制缺陷的神经电生理机制。方法采用视觉事件相关电位Go/Nogo实验方式,对16例惊恐障碍患者(PD)和13名健康对照(NC)进行研究。任务为随机出现的等概率双英文字母和单英文字母,要求被试者对双英文字母进行按键反应(Go),单英文字母不按键(Nogo),记录行为学数据和32导脑电数据。结果惊恐障碍患者和正常对照组均产生了明显的额中央区Nogo-N2(PD组:F1,30=8.00,P=0.08;NC组:F1,24=4.60,P=0.042)和Nogo—P3效应(PD组:F1,30=7.85,P=0.09;NC组:F1,24=13.57,P=0.000),但是惊恐障碍患者的Nogo—N2和Nogo—P3波幅明显低于正常对照组(Fz:F=9.135,P=0.005;F=8.511,P=0.006),潜伏期差异无统计学意义。结论惊恐障碍患者脑信息加工过程特定时间窗抑制性控制障碍,为进一步揭示惊恐障碍的发病机制提供了新的脑电生理证据。 Objective To investigate the electrophysiological evidence of inhibitory control deficit in panic disorder patients using a visual simple Go/ Nogo task. Method Sixteen patients with panic disorder and 13 healthy volunteers received a visual simple Go/Nogo task. The stimuli were single or double English letters and appeared with equal probability. The subjects were instructed to press a button as quickly as possible when the double letter was presented ( i. e. , Go), but make no response to the single letter ( i. e. , Nogo). 32 channel EEG data were recorded. Result All subjects displayed a distinct Go/Nogo effect in the N2 component(PD group:F1,30 = 8.00,P =0. 008 ;NC group:F1, 24 = 4.60,P =0.042) and P3 component ( PD group : F1 ,30 = 7.85, P = 0. 009 ; NC group : F1 .24 = 13.57, P = 0. 000 ) at frontocentral sites, but the amplitudes of Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3 were significantly reduced in panic disorder patients as compared to the healthy subjects ( Fz: F = 9.135, P = 0.005 ; F = 8.511, P = 0. 006, respectively). There was no significant differences between the latencies of Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3. Conclusion Panic disorder may consist inhibitory control deficit which may assist in offering new objective evidence to understand the etiology of panic disorder.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第41期2912-2915,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30570477) 大连市科委社会发展基金资助项目(2005E21SF133)
关键词 惊恐发作 抑制 事件相关电位 Panic disorder Inhibit Event-related potential
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Clark DM. Anxiety disorders: why they persist and how to treat them. Behav Res Ther, 1999,37 (Suppl) 1:5-27.
  • 2Malizia AL, Cunningham V J, Bell C J, et al. Decreased brain GABA (A) - benzodiazepine receptor binding in panic disorder : preliminary results from a quantitative PET study. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1998,55:715-720.
  • 3Bishop S, Duncan J, Brett M, et al. Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety : controlling attention to threat-related stimuli. Nat Neurosci ,2004,7 : 184-188.
  • 4李青栋,许晶,赵仑,刘效巍,张炳蔚.惊恐障碍患者听觉信息自动处理的事件相关电位研究[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(5):330-332. 被引量:6
  • 5Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam), 1999, 101:267-291.
  • 6Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol, 1993, 35 : 123-138.
  • 7Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Batch DM, et al. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev, 2001,108: 624-652.
  • 8Kamarajan C, Porjesz B, Jones KA, et al. Alcholism is a disinhibitory disorder:neurophysiological evidence from a Go/Nogo task. Bio Psychol,2005 ,69 :353-373.
  • 9Jodo E, Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/Nogo task. Eleetroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1992, 82: 477-482.
  • 10Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age, and time-on-task. J Psychophysiol, 2002, 16: 167-175.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Roy-Byrne PP,Craske MG,Stein MB.Panic disorder.Lancet,2006,368:1023-1032.
  • 2Bouton ME,Mineka S,Barlow DH.A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder.Psychol Rev,2001,108:4-32.
  • 3Marco-Pallares J,Grau C,Ruffini G.Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity.Neuroimage,2005,25:471-477.
  • 4Naatanen R,Jacobsen T,Winkler I.Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN):a review of the evidence.Psychophysiology,2005,42:25-32.
  • 5Clark CR,McFarlane AC,Weber DL,et al.Enlarged frontal P300 to stimulus change in panic disorder.Biol Psychiatry,1996,39:845-856.
  • 6Tiitinen H,May P,Reinikainen K,et al.Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory.Nature,1994,372:90-92.
  • 7Ludewig S,Geyer MA,Ramseier M,et al.Information-processing deficits and cognitive dysfunction in panic disorder.J Psychiatry Neurosci,2005,30:37-43.
  • 8Naatanen R.Mismatch negativity:clinical research and possible applications.Int J Psychophysiol,2003,48:179-188.
  • 9Carral V,Huotilainen M,Ruusuvirta T,et al.A kind of auditory 'primitive intelligence' already present at birth.Eur J Neurosci,2005,21:3201-3204.
  • 10Hettema JM,Neale MC,Kendler KS.A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders.Am J Psychiatry,2001,158:1568-1578.

共引文献5

同被引文献24

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部