期刊文献+

充填式无张力疝修补术与lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对比研究 被引量:22

A comparative study on Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy and Mesh plug (Rutkow method) for inguinal hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的应用价值。方法对腹股沟疝患者施行Lichtenstein修补术115例,充填式无张力疝修补术(Rutkow修补术)135例;比较两组患者的手术时间、术后恢复情况及复发率。随访中位数19个月。结果两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在术后下床活动时间、生活自理时间、住院天数、恢复日常工作天数方面,Lichtenstein组与充填式无张力疝修补术组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。Lichtenstein组、Rutkow组的手术均无明显并发症,复发率分别为0%、0.7%,差异无显著性。结论Lichtenstein修补术是腹股沟疝的良好修补法。 Objective To evaluate the value of Lichtenstein operation for inguinal hernia. Methods Lichtenstein operation was used for 115 patients of inguinal hernia, meanwhile 135 patients were treated by Mesh plug ( Rutkow method ) operation. We compared the operation time, post-operation recovery and recurrence rate between two groups. The average followed-up time was 19 monthe. Results The operation time was no difference ( P 〉 0.05 ). The moving and recovering time, hospital stay, the days recovering ordinary work in Liehtenstein operation group were than that in Mesh plug operation group no diference( P 〉 0. 05 ). In the former group,No complications rate and recurrent rate, compared with 0% ,0.7% no diferenee (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Liehtenstein operation is a perfect repair procedures for inguinal hernia.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2008年第1期53-54,共2页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹股沟 外科手术 腹股沟疝修补术 补片 Hernia, inguinal Surgical procedures, operative Inguinal hernia repair Patch
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1Ira M. Rutkow,Alan W. Robbins.Mesh plug hernia repair: A follow-up report[J].Surgery.1995(5)

同被引文献101

引证文献22

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部