摘要
对马克思"劳动"批判真实语境的误读是西方学者逃离社会批判理论唯物主义路径的主要原因之一。在马克思社会批判理论体系中,"劳动"批判是在历史辩证法的现实逻辑中得到整体定位的:第一,劳动是在实践哲学视角中凸现的感性活动,劳动概念的形成与实践概念的提升存在着内在的联系;第二,现实的人及其社会关系是马克思"劳动"批判的主体性依据,劳动确切地讲是社会批判理论现实、历史的载体;第三,劳动活动历史超越性的实质是工具理性的现实消解,而不是非劳动美学设定。
The article considers that, in 20th century, west scholars' critique of Marx is mainly based on misunderstanding of the real context of Marx' s " labour " critique. On reading the texts of Herbmas, Heidegger and Baudrillard, the article expounds: Firstly, work is a kind of perceptual activites in the angle of practical philosophy, there is an intrinsic relation between the formation of concepts work and practice; Secondly, the realistic people and its the social relations are Marx's basis of critique theory; Thirdly, the history transcendence of labour is the critique of Tool's Ration, nor the non-labour esthetics hypothesis.
出处
《上海行政学院学报》
CSSCI
2008年第6期11-16,共6页
The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute