期刊文献+

生态敏感区建筑遗产群保护规划方法探索——以浙江大学之江校区为例 被引量:6

Conservation planning method of architectural heritage groups in ecologically sensitive areas:the conservation planning study of Zhijiang Campus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 任何程度的扩建和增建都可能对生态敏感区内的建筑遗产本身,或其所在的生态环境造成损失.本文将以位于西湖风景名胜区的浙江大学之江校区为例,对生态林保护区、建筑遗产群环境及其相互关系进行客观评价.评价基于ArcGIS分析平台,利用多因子叠加评价体系,分析和评估建筑遗产群所处的生态环境,在保证对生态环境、原有规划格局以及建筑遗产不受破坏的前提下,结合学校发展计划,提出空间引导与管制方案,充分利用现有资源的潜质并从中获得最大效益. It would damage the architectural heritages and its eco environment to extend or add any more buildings in the ecology sensitive area. Zbijiang Campus of Zbejiang University is taken as an example. The purpose is to seek a reasonable conservation, extension, addition and function-replacement method, which is suitable for the high ecolo gy sensitive area and valuable architectural heritages. The relation ship between eco-environment and architectural heritages is analyzed by means of overlaying factors with the advanced ArcGIS. A reasonable plan for space guidance and control of conservation is made and extension and addition design method is supplied to answer to the university development plan, on the premise of minimizing potential damages to eco-environment, original planning pattern and architectural heritages.
作者 李咏华 赵宁
出处 《浙江大学学报(理学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期707-713,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition)
关键词 多因子叠加 生态敏感区 生态安全水平 之江校区 overlaying factors ecology-sensitive areas biological security level Zhijiang Campus
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1李家永,游松才,冷允法,张红旗.GIS支持的县级区域开发与规划的土地资源评价──以江西省泰和县为例[J].地域研究与开发,1996,15(1):8-13. 被引量:14
  • 2欧阳志云,王如松,符贵南.生态位适宜度模型及其在土地利用适宜性评价中的应用[J].生态学报,1996,16(2):113-120. 被引量:158
  • 3Senes G, Toccolini A. Sustainable land use planning in protected rural areas in Italy [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 41: 107-117.
  • 4Lathrop R G, Bognar Jr J A. Applying GIS and landscape ecological principles to evaluate land conservation alternatives[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 41: 27-41.
  • 5Steiner F, McSherry L, Jill Cohen. Land suitability analysis for the upper Gila River watershed [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 50: 199- 214.
  • 6International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments.
  • 7Phili Pregill, Nancy Volloman, Landscapes in History, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold,1993,p604~616
  • 8马丁·吉尔伯特,《二十世纪世界史》,第一卷,西安,陕西师范大学出版社,2003,p.379,380,396.
  • 9Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne (CIAM), La Charte d'Athenes or The Athens Charter, 1933.Trans J. Tyrwhitt. Paris,France: The Library of the Graduate School of Design,Harvard University,1946.第57条,第68条,第65-70条,第70条,第67,69条.
  • 10《关于历史古迹修复的雅典宪章》,The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments, 文本来源: www.icomos.org.一般性结论第四条.一般性结论第三条,一般性结论第六条,一般性结论第一条.

共引文献143

同被引文献91

引证文献6

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部