主观考试评分差异研究综述被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要主观考试的评分由于主观性太强,一致性不高,缺乏信度,部分评分会偏离被试的真实水平。因此,怎样减少主观评分差异,提高评分信度一直是国内外测量学界关注的首要问题之一,本文对有关这一问题的研究做了一个较为全面的回顾。

作者李传益

机构地区咸宁学院外国语学院

出处《咸宁学院学报》 2008年第5期121-123,共3页 Journal of Xianning University

关键词主观评分评分差异评分信度

参考文献11

1Conrad, D. Judging the judges: improving rater reliability at music contests [ M]. 2003. http://www. answers.com
2Wigglesworth, G. Exploring bias analysis as a tool for improving rater consistency in assessing oral interaction [ J ]. Language Testing, 1993,10 (3).
3Lumley,T. Aassessment criteria in a large - scale writing test:what do they really mean to the raters [ J ]. Language Testing. 2002, 3,246 -276.
4Brennan, R. L. C, eneralizability theory [ M]. New York: Springer - Verlag Inc, 2001.
5Brown, J. D. Questions and answers about language testing statistics : generalizability and decision studie [ J ]. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 2005, 9( 1 ) ,12 - 16. http://www. answers.com.
6Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A.(). The construct validation of the FSI oral interview [ J ]. Language Learning, 1981, 31,67 - 86.
7Kuang, D. C. & Steinberg, L. Assessing performance: investigation of the influence of item context using item response theory methods. Poster session presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2004, Chicago,IL. 1 - 17.
8王跃武,朱正才,杨惠中.作文网上评分信度的多面Rasch测量分析[J].外语界,2006(1):69-76. 被引量：29
9田清源.主观评分中多面Rasch模型的应用[J].心理学探新,2006,26(1):70-73. 被引量：16
10Lunz, M.E. et al. Measuring the impact of judge severity on examination scores [ J ]. Applied Measurement in Education, 1990, 3,331-345.

1王跃武.大学英语四、六级考试作文网上阅卷系统(原型)简介[J].外语界,2004(4):67-73. 被引量：10
2王跃武.大学英语四、六级考试作文网上阅卷实验研究[J].外语界,2004(5):74-79. 被引量：24
3刘建达.话语填充测试方法的多层面Rasch模型分析[J].现代外语,2005,28(2):157-169. 被引量：46
4Linacre J M. Many-faceted Rasch Measurement [ M]. Chicago, IL: MESA Press, 1989.
5Lumley T and McNamara T F. Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training [ J ]. Language Testing, 1995, 12:54-71.
6Tyndall B and Kenyon D M. Validation of a new holistic rating scale using Rasch multi-faceted analysis [ A ].In Cumming A and Berwick R ( eds. ). Validation in Language Testing [ C ]. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters,1996.
7Lynch B and McNamara T F. Using g-theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants [ J]. Language Testing, 1998, 15 : 158 - 180.
8Weigle S C. Using FACETS to model rater training effects [ J]. Language Testing, 1998, 15:263 -287.
9Kondo-Brown K. A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance[J]. Language Testing, 2002, 19:3 -31.
10Bonk W J and Ockey G J. A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task [ J ].Language Testing, 2003, 20:89- 110.

咸宁学院学报

2008年第5期

内容加载中请稍等...