1Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, et al. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation, 1995,92:2157-2162.
2Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A, et al. Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and eldetron beam CT. Am J Roentgenol, 2001 : 176 : 1295-1298.
3Carr J J, Crouse JR, Goff DC. Evaluation of subsecond gated helical CT for Qualitifiction of coronary artery calcium and comparison with electron beam CT. Am J Roentgenol, 2000174:915-921.
4WS. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical ExpertConsensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49 : 378-402.
5Leber AW, Knez A, Von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 46: 147- 154,
6Leshka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology : first experience. Eur Heart J 2005,26:1482-1487.
7Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Van Mieghem C, et al. High- resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation, 2005, 112 : 2318-2323.
8Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol,2005,16: 575-582.
9Raft GL, Gallagher M J, O' Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46: 552-557.
10Sehuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multisliee eomputed tomography in the non-invasive evaluation of signifieant eoronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol,2006,98 : 145-148.
3Schuijf JD,Bax JJ,Jukema JW,et al.Noninvasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography in hypertensive patients.Hypertensive,2005,45:227-232.
4Mollet N,Cademartiri F,Nieman K,et al.Multislice spiral computed tomopraphy coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43:2265-2270.
5Scanlon P,Faxon D,Audet A,et al.Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention.ACC/AHA guideline for coronary angiography:a report of the American college of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines(Committee on coronary angiography).J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,33:1756-1824.
6Bashore TM,Bates ER,Berger PB,et al.American college of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards:a report of the American college of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37:2170-2214.
7Gerber TC,Kuzo RS,Lane GE,et al.Image quality in a standardized algorithm for minimally invasive coronary angiograhy with multislice spiral computed tomograhy.J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27:62.
8Austen W,Edward J,Frye R,et al.A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease:report of the AdHoc committee for Grading of Coronary Artery disease,Council on Cardiovascular surgery,American Heart Association.Circulation,1975,51:5-50.
4Christopher U,Alexander B,Ines G,et al.Stable coronary artery disease:prognostic value of myocardial perfusion SPECT in relation to coronary calcium scoring-longterm follow-up.Radiology,2009,252:682-690.
5Hacker M,Becker C.The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography risk assessment.J Nucl Cardiol,2011,18:700-711.
8Alan R,Heidi G,Nathan DW,et al.Cardiac imaging for ischemia in asymptornatic patients:use of coronary artery calcium scanning to improve patient selection:lessons from the EISNER study daniel S.Berman asymptomatic atherosclerosis contemporary.Cardiology,2010,411-427.
9Perrone-Filardi P,Achenbach S,Mohlenkamp S,et al.Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease:A position statement of the working group on nuclear cardiology and cardiac CT of the European society of cardiology.Eur Heart J,2011,32:1986-1993.
10Madsen C,Andersen KF,Zerahn B.High coronary artery calcium score affects clinical outcome despite normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging and normal left ventricular ejection fraction.Coron Artery Dise,2013,24:142-147.
