对分析实证主义法学哲学基础的批判及反思

A Criticism and Rethinking on the Philosophical Base of Analytical Positivist Law

实证主义哲学对经验之外的形而上学命题进行了否定,这种认知范式在法学领域的运用就是分析实证主义法学的产生。与此同时,反实证主义者则从价值中立的不真实性、经验证实原则的无效性、反形而上学的不可能性以及归纳法的困境等方面对实证主义作出了批驳。需要判断的是,那些批驳在哲学中的真实度以及在法学中的有效性究竟如何。

Positivism holds a negative attitude towards the metaphysical propositions beyond experience, whose cognitive paradigm applied to jurisprudence produces the analytical positivist law. In the mean time, the anti - positivists refute positivism from many sides such as falsehood of value free, invalidity of the principle of empirical verification, impossibility of anti - metaphysics and predicament of the inductive method. It is essential to think deeply how to judge the degree of reality in philosophy and the validity in law of the refutation.