期刊文献+

决策任务结构化的群体研讨过程和模式 被引量:7

Procedures and Mode of the Structuring Group Decision Task
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于对大多数重要的决策需要成立决策群体以共同做出决策,首先建立了一个群体决策任务的研讨模型,提出了4类"研讨模式":①交互群体中群体成员的主动研讨;②名义群体中群体成员的主动研讨;③交互群体中群体成员的被动研讨;④名义群体中群体成员的被动研讨。最后,以某公司如何开拓市场空间的研讨结构化为例,探讨了研讨模式1在群体决策任务结构化研讨中的应用。 Many decision tasks organizations face are too complex to be accomplished by the rugged individualist.Therefore,groups form to make the most of important decisions in organizations.But decision groups that have often suffered the grinding drudgery of meetings-without-end know how unproductive to deal with their tasks.This paper formulates an argumentation model for group decision tasks,and then presents four types of argumentation procedures for group decision task structuring(AP-GDTS).The four types of modes are Type Ⅰ: active argumentation of group members in an interactive group;Type Ⅱ: active argumentation of group members in a nominal group;Type Ⅲ: passive argumentation of group members in interactive group;and then Type Ⅳ: passive argumentation of group members in nominal group.This paper illustrates the application of Type Ⅰ to the argumentation of structuring a group decision task of how to expend market share in YIBAO company at last.
出处 《系统管理学报》 北大核心 2008年第5期572-576,共5页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70533030) 博士后基金资助项目(20060390627)
关键词 群体决策 决策任务 任务结构 群体支持系统 group decision-making decision task task structure group support systems
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Nunamaker J F.Electronic meeting systems:Ten years lessons learned[M].Groupware:Technology and Applications,1995.
  • 2[2]Simon H A.The new science of management decision[M].New York:Harper,1960.
  • 3[3]Dennis A R Structuring time and task in electronic brainstorming[J].MIS Quarterly,1999,23(1):95.
  • 4[4]Zhang Peng-zhu,Wang Ying-luo.Flexible planning and dynamic integration for problem solving in SXSES-DSS[J].Decision Support Systems,1998,24:164-172.
  • 5[5]Bui Tung X ARBAS:A formal language to support argumentation in network-based organizations[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,1997,14(3):223.
  • 6[6]Toulmin S E The use of arguments[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1958.
  • 7孙景乐,张朋柱.一种互补的研讨框架的设计与实现[J].系统工程学报,2001,16(5):360-365. 被引量:25

二级参考文献7

  • 1[1]Carey J M, Kacmar C J. The impact of communication mode and task complexity on s mall group performance and member satisfaction[J]? Computers in Human Behavior ,1997,13 (1): 23-49
  • 2[2]Rescher N. Dialectics: a controversy-oriented approach to the theory of know ledge[M]. Albany:State University of New York Press,1977
  • 3[3]Geffner H,Pearl J. Conditional entailment:bridging two approaches to default reasoning[J]. Artificial Intelligence,1992,53(2-3):209-244
  • 4[4]Fox J, Krause P,Elvang-Gransson M.Argumentation as a general framework for unce rtain reasoning[C].Proceedings of the UAI-93 Conference, San Mato,CA:Morgan K aufmann,1993.428-434
  • 5[5]Karacapilidis N,Pappis C. Computer-supported collaborative argumen tation and fuzzy similarity measures in multiple criteria decision making[J]. Computer & Operations Research, 2000,27:653-671
  • 6[6]Conklin J. Designing organizational memory: preserving intellectual assets in a knowledge economy[EB/OL]. GDSS Working Paper[M], http://www.gdss.com/dom.htm ,1996
  • 7[7]Conklin J,Begeman M L.GIBIS: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation[C]. Proceedings of the Hypertext89 Conference, New York:ACM,1989.105-107

共引文献24

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部