期刊文献+

解决“假定现实性”争论的基本方案——试论假定的基本类型

Solution to Disagreement on Assumptive Realism——On Basic Kinds of Assumptions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学者们对假定现实性问题的长达半个世纪的争论,其根源在于对假定基本类型界定不清。如果把假定区分为存在或结构性假定、动机或性质性假定与关系性假定,不但可以整合不同学者对假定的基本认识,也可以解释不同学者所具有的不同观点的原因,进而为解决争论提供基础。 Scholars have been debating over the realism of assumptions for more than half-century. The reason is that they could not define the basic kinds of assumptions clearly. If assumptions are divided into three kinds: existing or constructive assumptions, motive or property assumptions, and relationship assumptions, we can not only integrate the view of various scholars, but also interpret the reason of differences among them, and provide solution to debate.
出处 《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期116-121,共6页 Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词 假定 基本类型 关系型假定 assumption, basic kinds, relation assumption
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Friedman, M. Essays in Positive Economies[C]. The University of Chicago Press, 1953.
  • 2Blaug, M. The Methodology of Economics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1992.
  • 3Caldwell, B,J. Beyond Positivism[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
  • 4Maki, U. Friedman and Realism[J]. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology.JAI Press InC. 1992.vol.10.
  • 5Machlup, E The Problem of Veriflcation in Economics[J]. Southern Economic Journal.1955,No. 1.
  • 6Rotwein, E. On 'The Methodology of Positive Economics' [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1959.No.4.
  • 7Musgrave, A. Unreal Assumptions in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted[J]. Kyklos. 1981.Vol.34.
  • 8Maki, U. Kinds of Assumptions and Their Truth: Shaking an Untwisted F-Twist[J]. Kyklos. 2000.Vol.53.317.
  • 9Archibald, GC. The State of Economic Science[J]. British Journal for the philosophy of science, 1959. No.37.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部