摘要
近年来有关周梅森小说的评论文章显示出一个类似倾向,即认为上世纪90年代中期以后,周梅森实现了创作"转型"。笔者认为这个界说值得商榷。实际上,周梅森前后两个时段的创作存在着内在一致性。不能基于题材分野就将之割裂开来甚至厚此薄彼。本论文结合作家创作谈,从叙事模式、叙事意图、价值理念这三个方面考察比较两大题材系列的文本,来具体阐发上述观点。
Most critics about Zhou Meisen's novels in recent years have presented a similar tendency --they believed that there was "transform" on the writer's creation after the mid- 90 s. But I think this definition is worth deliberating. In fact, there are a few same intrinsic characteristics in Zhou's early and later period creation. So we can't separate his creation in terms of the different themes. Based on the writer's introduction of his creation, this article tries to elaborat this viewpoint specifically, by comparing the history series with the reality political series texts from three aspects -- narrative style, narrative intention and value idea.
出处
《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第6期87-92,共6页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
周梅森
创作“转型”
叙事模式
叙事意图
价值理念
Zhou Meisen, creation "transform", narrative style, narrative intention, value idea