摘要
BACKGROUND： Twenty-four hour ambulatory electroencephatography （AEEG） provides advantages for continuous electroencephalogram, monitoring brief loss of consciousness complicated by suspect or mild limb spasm. OBJECTIVE： To explore the significance of AEEG for differentially diagnosing epilepsy and syncope, compared to EEG. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING： Sixty patients with brief loss of consciousness, complicated by suspect or mild limb spasm, were selected from Suqian People＇s Hospital between January 2006 and June 2007. PARTICIPANTS： Sixty participants comprised 34 males and 26 females, aged 13-64 years. According to clinical symptoms prior to the study, 36 patients were initially diagnosed with epilepsy and 24 with syncope. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： Abnormalities and epileptiform discharge were detected using EEG and AEEG, and the diagnostic value of the two methods for epilepsy and syncope was compared. RESULTS： A total of sixty patients were included in the final analysis. Abnormal AEEGs were observed in 37 cases （62%） and epileptiform discharge AEEGs in 23 cases （38%）, both of which were significantly greater than EEGs [37% （22/60）, 18% （11/60）, respectively, P 〈 0.01, 0.05]. The detection rate of abnormal AEEG and epileptiform discharge in the epilepsy group [75% （27/36）, 47% （17/36）, respectively was significantly greater than in the syncope group [42% （10/24）, 25% （6/24）, respectively, P 〈 0.01, 0.05]. CONCLUSION： AEEG can improve detection probability of epileptiform discharge and exhibits significant differences in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and syncope.
BACKGROUND： Twenty-four hour ambulatory electroencephatography （AEEG） provides advantages for continuous electroencephalogram, monitoring brief loss of consciousness complicated by suspect or mild limb spasm. OBJECTIVE： To explore the significance of AEEG for differentially diagnosing epilepsy and syncope, compared to EEG. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING： Sixty patients with brief loss of consciousness, complicated by suspect or mild limb spasm, were selected from Suqian People＇s Hospital between January 2006 and June 2007. PARTICIPANTS： Sixty participants comprised 34 males and 26 females, aged 13-64 years. According to clinical symptoms prior to the study, 36 patients were initially diagnosed with epilepsy and 24 with syncope. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： Abnormalities and epileptiform discharge were detected using EEG and AEEG, and the diagnostic value of the two methods for epilepsy and syncope was compared. RESULTS： A total of sixty patients were included in the final analysis. Abnormal AEEGs were observed in 37 cases （62%） and epileptiform discharge AEEGs in 23 cases （38%）, both of which were significantly greater than EEGs [37% （22/60）, 18% （11/60）, respectively, P 〈 0.01, 0.05]. The detection rate of abnormal AEEG and epileptiform discharge in the epilepsy group [75% （27/36）, 47% （17/36）, respectively was significantly greater than in the syncope group [42% （10/24）, 25% （6/24）, respectively, P 〈 0.01, 0.05]. CONCLUSION： AEEG can improve detection probability of epileptiform discharge and exhibits significant differences in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and syncope.
