期刊文献+

不同磁场强度下镍铬合金固定修复体MRI伪影的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of MRI artifacts caused by Ni-Cr alloy fixed prostheses on different field-strength magnets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同磁场强度(1.5T和3.0 T)对镍铬合金固定修复体磁共振成像(MRI)中伪影的影响。方法以镍铬合金制作不同厚度的单冠、桥修复体及上半口修复体作为试样,置于盛有清水的容器中央,分别于1.5 T和3.0 T的磁场强度下进行MR扫描,勾画和计算伪影面积并进行比较分析,以相同形状和厚度的塑料修复体作为对照修复体。结果镍铬合金固定修复体在MRI中均可产生伪影,其面积随修复体体积的增加而扩大,而对照修复体未见伪影形成。与1.5 T MRI相比,3.0 T MRI上产生的伪影面积显著增大(P<0.05);相同磁场强度下,与扫描序列T_2WI相比,扫描序列T_1WI上所形成的伪影面积显著增大(P<0.05)。结论口腔内有镍铬合金固定修复体的患者在行MRI检查时,应选择较低的磁场强度及快速自旋回波序列进行扫描。应避免选用镍铬合金制作大范围固定修复体。 Objective To evaluate the influence of different field-strength magnets (1.5 T and 3.0 T) on MRI artifacts caused by Ni-Cr alloy fixed prostheses. Methods The crown, bridge and upper denture fixed prostheses with different thickness were produced by Ni-Cr alloy as test samples, and were one by one put on the centre of water phantom for MR scanning with different field-strength magnets (1.5 T and 3.0 T). The artifact areas on these two field-strength magnets were measured and statistically compared. The plastic prostheses with the same shape and thickness as the test samples were served as controls. Results Ni-Cr alloy fixed prostheses could cause MRI artifacts, and the artifact areas increased with the mass of prostheses. However, no artifact area was found in controls. Compared with those on 1.5 T magnet, the MRI artifact areas significantly increased on 3. 0 T magnet ( P 〈 0.05). Under the same field-strength, the artifact areas significantly increased by scanning sequence T1WI than those by T2WI (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The lower field strength and fast spin echo sequence should be selected for MRI examinations in patients wearing fixed prostheses made of Ni-Cr alloy. Ni-Cr alloy should be avoided for the fixed prostheses of big mass.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期1369-1372,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
关键词 伪影 磁共振成像 磁场强度 镍铬合金 修复体 artifact MRI field strength Ni-Cr alloy prosthesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1高元贵,蔡幼拴,蔡祖龙.磁共振成像诊断学[M].3版.北京:人民军医出版社,1999:122-128.
  • 2Laakman RW, Kaufman B, Han JS, et al. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants [ J ]. Radiology, 1985,15 ( 7 ) : 11 - 14.
  • 3Lissac M, Metrop D, Brugirard J, et al. Dnetal materials and magnetic resonance imaging[ J]. Invest Radiol,1991,26(1 ) :40 -45.
  • 4霍沃德里.颅脑MR和CT诊断学[M].西安:世界图书出版西安公司,2001:75-99.
  • 5Vikhoff B, Ribbelin S, Kohler B, et al. Artefacts caused by dental filling materials in MR imaging [ J]. Acta Radiologica, 1995, 36 (3) :23 -25.
  • 6戴永雨,张晶,高培毅,何志华.牙科金属对头部磁共振成像的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,1996,30(6):409-409. 被引量:4
  • 7林江,陈祖望,周康荣,沈继章,陈财忠,解春,俞立英.口腔内金属材料和磁共振检查伪影[J].临床放射学杂志,1999,18(1):14-17. 被引量:6
  • 8包博,施生根,崔三哲,周建中,张建波,金真,曾亚伟.金合金、镍络合金铸造冠对磁共振成像检查的影响[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2003,13(9):506-508. 被引量:8
  • 9Tominaga T, Shimizu H,Koshu K,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of titanium anterior cervical spine palting systems[J]. Neurosurgery, 1995,36(9) :51 -55.
  • 10刘于宝,胡道予,邵剑波,夏黎明,王承缘,李震.不同场强下部分DSA介入性器械伪影的探讨[J].医学影像学杂志,2004,14(3):229-232. 被引量:2

二级参考文献8

  • 1Laakman R W,Radiology,1985年,157期,711页
  • 2Frahm C,Gehl HB,Melchert UH,et al.Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,1996,19:335-340.
  • 3Ladd ME,Erhart P,Debatin JF,et al.Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts[J].Magn Reson Med,1996,36:646-651.
  • 4Wildermuth S,Debatin JF,Leung DA,et al.MR imaging-guided intravascular procedures:initial demonstration in a pig model[J].Radiology,1997,202:578-583.
  • 5Wildermuth S,Dumoulin CL,Pammatter T,et al.MR-guided percutaneous angioplasty:assessment of tracking safety,catheter handling and functionality[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,1998,21:404-410.
  • 6武乐斌,李成利,林征宇,陈立光,邱秀玲,李康安.介入性磁共振技术临床应用经验初探[J].医学影像学杂志,2002,12(2):96-98. 被引量:12
  • 7施生根,金真,包博,周建中,曾亚伟,张建波,崔三哲,阚管汉.镍铬合金铸造冠对磁共振成像影响的研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2002,3(4):205-207. 被引量:9
  • 8刘于宝,胡道予,夏黎明,王承缘.介入性磁共振器械的研究[J].放射学实践,2003,18(8):611-613. 被引量:8

共引文献18

同被引文献40

  • 1孙樱林,刘玉华.镍铬合金固定修复体对MRI影像的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2007,21(1):72-74. 被引量:17
  • 2尹建忠.MRI基础[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2004:205-238.
  • 3王骏,赵海涛,张益兰,等主编.医学影像技术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011.
  • 4吴海廷,朱国威,杨晓红,张勇,赵柏松,陈林.镍铬合金上不同厚度瓷覆盖后唾液中镍铬元素含量分析[J].遵义医学院学报,2007,30(3):236-239. 被引量:2
  • 5Lenzi TL,Marquezan M, Bonini GC ,et al.Repairing ditched amalgam restorations is less time and tooth structure-con-suming than replacement[J].Eur Arch Paediatr Dent,2013, 14(5):345-349.
  • 6Dengg S, Kneissl S.Comparison of susceptibility artifacts generated by microchips with different geometry at 1.5 Tesla magnet resonance imaging.A phantom pilot study re-ferring to the ASTM standard test method F2119-07[J]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere, 2013,41 (5):289-296.
  • 7Graves MJ,Mitchell DG.Body MRI artifacts in clinical prac-tice:a physicist's and radiologist's perspective[J].J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013,38(2):269-287.
  • 8Sirin S, Goericke SL, Huening BM,et al.Evaluation of 100 brain examinations using a 3 Tesla MR-compatible incu-bator-safety,handling,and image quality[J].Neuroradiolo-gy, 2013,55 (10):1241-1249.
  • 9Blankenstein FH,Truong B, Thomas A,et al.Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials[J].Rofo, 2006,178 (8):787.
  • 10Kazuyuki Minowa DDS, Satoru ABE, Sawamura T,et al.A method of reducing susceptibility artifacts in MRI of the head and neck region[J].Oral Radiology, 1997,13 (1):45-49.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部