期刊文献+

“慎刑”与“宽严相济”——以中国传统法为视角的考察 被引量:1

"Cautious Punishment" and "Tempering Criminal Policy with Mercy"——Examining from the perspective of traditional Chinese law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "慎刑"是中国传统法具有和谐价值的重要组成部分,能达到缓和阶级矛盾,维持政权稳定的作用。"宽严相济"是当前我国具有社会主义法制特色的刑事政策,对于化解社会矛盾、最大限度地减少不和谐因素,维护和谐稳定的社会秩序等方面有重要作用。"宽严相济"与"慎刑"存在历史的相通性,宽严相济的传统文化基础是"以人为本"和"德法兼济",而传统社会实现社会稳定、长治久安的法律手段即是"慎刑"。"慎刑"在立法层面上体现为"刑罚世轻世重",在司法层面上体现为程序上的严谨及人伦观照。"慎刑"促进了中国古代社会的稳定及政权的长治久安,对当前"宽严相济"刑事政策的立法及司法实践也具有借鉴意义。 "Cautious penalty" is an important part of traditional Chinese law with harmonious value, mitigating class contradiction and maintaining stability of regime. "Tempering criminal policy with mercy" as a criminal policy with Chinese characteristics on legal system has a vital role in resolving social contradiction, decreasing unharmonious factors to the largest degree and maintaining a harmonious and stable social order. "Tempering criminal policy with mercy" and "cautious penalty" are historically interlinked. The traditional cultural basis of "tempering criminal policy with mercy" is "putting people first" and "combining ethics and law", while the legal way of maintaining the stability of traditional" society remains following "cautious punishment". In legislation, "cautious punishment" is represented by " according to the standard that things change as time flies to decide the propriety on penalty", and in judicature, it is embodied by preciseness of program and care from humanity. "Cautious punishment" had promoted both the stability of ancient Chinese society and that of regimes, and has great meaning of reference for the legislation and practice of current "tempering criminal policy with mercy".
出处 《学术交流》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第11期65-68,共4页 Academic Exchange
关键词 慎刑 宽严相济 传统法 cautious penalty tempering criminal policy with mercy traditional law
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1张晋藩.中华法系特点探源[J].法学研究,1980,2(4):48-54. 被引量:15
  • 2崔敏.再论少杀慎刑与构建和谐社会[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2007,23(1):33-42. 被引量:5
  • 3梁根林.《刑事政第:立场与范畴》.法律出版社,2005年版.第23,42页.
  • 4《商君书·去强》.
  • 5王亚凯,付立庆.《美国特色的严打法—加州三次打击法初论》.陈兴良主编.《中国刑事政策检讨—以“严打”刑事政策为视角》.中国检察出版社,2004年版.第351页.
  • 6(法)孟德斯鸠,张雁深,译.《论法的精神》:上册.商务印书馆,1961年版.第92页.
  • 7(意)贝卡里亚.《论犯罪与刑罚》.黄风译.中国大百科全书出版社,1993年版,第65页.
  • 8(日)团藤重光.《死刑废止论》.林辰彦,译.台北商鼎文化出版社,1997年版,第267页.
  • 9(韩)金仁善.《关于韩国执行死刑的现状与死刑制度的改善方向的再思考》.赵秉志主编.《中韩刑法基本问题研讨—“首届中韩刑法学术研讨会”学术文集》.中国人民公安大学出版社,2005年版.第168页.
  • 10(美)大卫·特德·约翰逊.“美国与日本的死刑悖论”.陈兴良主编.《刑事法评论》第15卷.中国政法大学出版社,2004年版.第43页.

共引文献372

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部