1Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies. Aeta Cytol, 1985, 29 (6) : 1043-1046.
2Yeoh GP, Chan KW. The accuracy of Papanicolaou smear predictions: cytohistological correlation of 283 cases. Hong Kong Med J, 1997, 3(4) :373-376.
3Bigras G, Rieder MA, Larnbercy JM, et al. Keeping Collecting Device in liquid medium is mandatory to ensure optimized liquidbased cervical cytologic sampling. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2003,7 (3) :168-174.
4Woodhouse SL, Stastny JF, Styer PE, et al. Interrobserver variability in subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions: result of the college of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1999,123( 11 ) :1079-1084.
5Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda system reporting cervical cytology. 2nd ed. New york :Springer, 2004:67-87.
6Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA, 2002,287(16) :2114-2119.
7Manos MM, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papinomavinus DNA testing for equivocal papanieolaou results. JAMA, 1999, 281 ( 17 ) : 1605- 1610.
