期刊文献+

屈原与韩愈的政治观试比较

A Comparative Study of Qu Yuan′s Political View and Han Yu′s
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对屈原与韩愈的政治观的试比较,认为:一、屈原与韩愈在关于政治权力来源的问题上有不同看法:屈原认为政治权力来自"祖先鬼",韩愈则认为来自天之"道";二、屈原和韩愈的施政措施也有所不同:屈原的施政措施具有非政治功利性的特点,而韩愈的施政措施具有儒学政治功利性的特点;三、在政治家角色观方面,韩愈比屈原有更强的谋生观念和儒家制欲观念。文章的结论是:由韩愈的事功可以推知,儒学政治家的政治观较少地受到屈原政治观的影响,屈原的影响主要集中在文学和其个人人格方面。 Through a comparative study of Qu Yuan′s political view and Han Yu′s,the paper discusses their differences and similarities.The paper holds that Qu Yuan believed that political power originated from the Ghosts of Ancestry while Han Yu believed that it came from the 'Tao' of Heaven.Qu Yuan's political measures had the traits of non-political utilitarianism while Han Yu′s had the characteristics of the political utilitarianism of Confucianism.In the perspective of political statesmen,Han Yu had a stronger desire of livelihood and more restraints of Confucianism.This case study has reached the following conclusion: judging from Han Yu′s deeds and achievements,Qu Yuan′s political view had relatively little influence on Confucian statesmen and his influence finds expression more in literature through his personality.
作者 陈詠红
机构地区 广州大学
出处 《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第6期38-45,共8页 The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[2]洪兴祖.楚辞补注·离骚[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 2[3]洪兴祖.楚辞补注·九章·哀郢[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 3[4]洪兴祖.楚辞补注·天问[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 4杜预.春秋经传集解[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988..
  • 5[6]屈守元,常思春.韩愈全集校注[C].成都:四川大学出版社,1996.
  • 6[7]赵守正.管子注译(上)[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1987.
  • 7[8]赵守正.管子注译(下)[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1987.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部