期刊文献+

安全事故的人为因素与组织因素——4·28胶济铁路事故试析 被引量:4

Active Failures and Latent Conditions of System Accidents:Consider 4/28 Railway Accident
原文传递
导出
摘要 对待人为错误有两种观点:个体论和组织论。组织论认为,人为错误是组织运营过程的结果,而非仅仅是引发事故的原因。人为错误的根源不仅与人本身的弱点有关,更与组织因素有关。通过解析4·28胶济铁路事故,可以发现,命令传达系统、命令执行确认系统、自动控制设备、线路设计等组织因素与人为错误结合,导致了事故发生。 The human error problem can be viewed in two ways: the person approach and the system approach. To use the system approach, human errors are seen as consequences rather than causes, having their origins not so much in the perversity of human nature as in "upstream" systemic factors. Through the investigation of 4/28 railway accident, we can see some systemic factors of command delivery and check, control device, design that combined the human errors and caused the accident.
作者 刘湘丽
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第21期163-169,共7页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
关键词 组织因素 人为因素 安全管理 systemic factor human error safety management
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1科学技术部专题研究组.国际安全生产发展报告[M],北京:科学技术文献出版社,2006.
  • 2[日]上野信吾.JR福知山线事故的原因背景[R].安全政策研究报告,日本:三菱综合研究所,2005.
  • 3[日]内阁府.原子能安全白皮书[M].日本内阁府,2005.
  • 4James Reason. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accident[M]. Ashgate Publishing Limited, 1997.
  • 5James Reason. Human Error: Models and Management[J].BMJ, 18 MARCH 2000, (Volume 320) :768-770.
  • 6Max D. Discipline. The Role of Role Violation. [J]. Ground Effects, 1997, (2) : 1-4.
  • 7Weick, KE. Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability [J]. California Management Review, 1987, (29) :112-27.
  • 8M. Young,S. Shorrock,J. Faulkner and G,Braithwaite. Who Moved My (Swiss) Cheese? The (R)evolution of Human Factors in Transport Safety Investigation[J]. ISASI,2004.
  • 9James Reason. Human Error: Models and Management[J]. BMJ, 18 MARCH 2000, (Volume 320):768-770.
  • 10内阁府.原子能安全白皮书[M].日本内阁府,2005:5.

共引文献1

同被引文献15

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部