摘要
温特主张世界国家的出现是历史的必然。他认为,微观层次上争取承认的斗争,加上军事技术发展的推动,同时受到宏观层次上无政府性的引导,终将导致世界国家的诞生。围绕着世界国家生成的可能性问题,温特与尚侬之间展开了一场小论战。温特进行世界国家的研究确有意义,但他在世界国家的界定、对"他者"的认识等方面存在严重缺陷,导致他实际上未能回答世界国家生成是否可能这一问题。在世界体系演变的过程中,朝向世界国家方向的内部动力不充分、外部动力不存在,因此决定了世界国家生成的不可能,我们应该从其他方向去探索美好世界生成的路径。
Winter argues that the emergence of the world country is a historical necessity. In his view, the struggle for recognition at the micro level, coupled with the development of military technology, and driven by non-governmental guidance at the macro-level, will eventually lead to the birth of the world country. There is a small controversy between Winter and Lennon centered around the possibility of the emergence of the world country. It is a meaningful research for Winter to study the world country, but he has serious deficiencies in such areas as defining the world country and recognizing "otherness", which cause him not able to answer the problem whether there is possibility of generating the world country. During the Evolution of world system, the internal power towards the direction of the world country is not sufficient and the external power also does not exist, which decides that the world country can not be generated. We should explore the path to generate a better world from other ways.
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第6期114-122,共9页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences