期刊文献+

内镜超声引导下^125I粒子腹腔神经节照射近期安全性评价的实验研究 被引量:6

Evaluation of safety of celiac plexus brachytherapy with ^125 seeds placement guided by endoscopic ultrasound in porcine model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察EUS引导下^125I粒子腹腔神经节照射对大血管及周围脏器的影响。方法14只家猪随机分成4组:A组,空粒子种植对照;B组及C组分别选择放射活度为0.4mCi(1.48×10^7Bq)和0.8mCi(2.96×10^7Bq)的^125I粒子种植;D组行无水乙醇腹腔神经节阻滞术。A、B、C3组术后摄腹部平片和CT增强扫描以及血管三维重建辅助判断种植的准确性,D组单侧注射无水乙醇5ml,检测血常规、肝肾功能、血淀粉酶以及CD4^+/CD8^+值。观察期结束后处死,解剖观察粒子在位情况,取粒子周围组织、脏器送病理检测。结果A组1只与C组中1只种植失败(16.7%),隔日再行补种均成功,其余粒子均一次性植入,定位良好,除C组中1只术后7d出现白细胞升高,解剖发现局部小脓肿形成外,其余家猪血常规、肝肾功能、血淀粉酶以及CD4^+/CD8^+值穿刺前后均无差异。病理检测显示周围脏器均无异常发现,与对照组相比,^125I粒子照射的血管外膜有变性坏死,并伴随轻微炎性反应,周围有纤维组织增生,程度随照射剂量及照射时间的增加而略有加重,血管肌层、内膜均未受任何影响,血管内未见血栓形成。注射无水乙醇的家猪解剖发现其腹腔干呈淡褐色,较正常粗大,病理发现血管外膜及周围纤维结缔组织坏死出血明显,大量炎症细胞浸润。结论放射性粒子对周围脏器没有影响,不会损害其免疫功能,对血管有一定的损伤作用,但作用有限,较无水乙醇对血管的损伤小,因此EUS引导下^125I粒子腹腔神经节照射是安全的。 Objective To assess the safety of celiac plexus brachytherapy with ^125I seeds placement guided by endoscopic ultrasound in porcine model, and to evaluate its effect on surrounding vessels and organs. Methods Fourteen pigs were randomly divided into 4 groups to accept celiac plexus block by bilateral injection with 2 non-radioactive seeds in group A ( n = 4) , 0.4 mCi seeds in Group B ( n = 4) , 0. 8 mCi seeds in Group C ( n = 4) and one lateral injection with 5 ml dehydrated alcohol, respectively. Abdominal X- ray, Enhanced CT and three-dimensional reconstruction of blood vessels were performed to confirm the proper placement of the seeds in group A,B and C. Routine blood test, liver and renal function, serum amylase and CD4 ^+/CD8 ^+ ratio were examined preoperatively and at the end of the follow-up in all groups. Animals were euthanized in batch to observe the position of the implanted seeds. Tissues and organs around the seeds were dissected for pathological examination. Results The procedure succeeded in 12 pigs (85.7%) and failed in two others ( 1 in group A, and 1 in C) due to inappropriate position. Rescue procedures were performed on another day and succeeded. No significant difference was found in routine blood test, liver and renal func- tion, serum amylase and CD4 ^+/CD8 ^+ ratio, except WBC elevation and small abeesses were found 7 days after the procedure in one pig of group C. In the radiated area, there was degeneration, necrosis and mild inflammation at the outer membrane of blood vessels, with fibrosis around, which was positively correlated withthe radiation dosage and duration. There was no change at the muscular layer and the innermost membrane of blood vessels, and no thrombosis was found. In group D, the celiac trunk became slightly brown and wider with obvious hemorrhage, necrosis and infiltration of inflammatory ceils in the outer membrane of blood vessles and connective tissues around. Conclusion Brachytherapy has little negative effect on the organs around. It does not harm immunnity but induces lesions in blood vessels. Compared with dehydrated alcohol, this negative effect is limited. Therefore, celiac plexus brachytherapy with ^125I seeds guided by endoscopic ultrasound is safe.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 2008年第11期591-596,共6页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
基金 军队“十一五”面上项目(06MA165)
关键词 碘放射性同位素 内窥镜超声检查 近距离放射疗法 动物实验 Iodine Radioisotopes Endoscopic ultrasonography Brachytherapy Animal ex-perimentation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Sun S, Xu H,Xin J, et al. EUS-guided Interstitial brachytherapy of irresectable pancreatic cancer-resuhs of a pilot trial. Endoscopy, 2006,38 : 398 -402.
  • 2Jin Z, Du Y, Li Z, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided interstitial implantation of iodine 125 seeds combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy,2008,40:314-320.
  • 3Kulik LM, Carr BI, Mulcahy MF, et al. Safety and efficacy of 90Y radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis. Hepatology, 2008,47 : 71-81.
  • 4Zhang CL, Zhang TJ, Guo YN ,et al. Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block guided by computerized tomography on pancreatic cancer pain. Dig Dis Sci ,2008,53:856-860.
  • 5Wong GY, Schroeder DR, Cams PE,et al. Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain relief, quality of life, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA ,2004,291 : 1092-1099.
  • 6Rykowski JJ, Hilgier M. Efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block in varying locations of pancreatic cancer: influence on pain relief. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:347-354.
  • 7Stefaniak T, Basinski A, Vingerhoets A, et al. A comparison of two invasive techniques in the management of intractable pain due to inoperable pancreatic cancer: neurolytic celiac plexus block and videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2005,31:768-773.
  • 8Muscatiello N, Panella C, Pietrini L, et al. Complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Endoscopy, 2006,38:858.
  • 9Iftikhar S, Loflus EV Jr. Gastroparesis after celiac plexus block. Am J Gastroenterol, 1998,93:2223-2235.
  • 10Pusceddu C, Mameli S, Pili A, et al. Percutaneous neurolysis of the celiac plexus under CT guidance in the invasive treatment of visceral pain caused by cancer. Tumori,2003 ,89 :286-291.

二级参考文献3

共引文献25

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部