期刊文献+

钻井井身质量评价方法研究及软件实现 被引量:2

A Study on the Evaluation Methods of Drilling Well Bore Quality and the Application of Software
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的井身质量评价是对大量测量数据的简单计算处理,是通过与各单项的评价标准的对比,得到井身质量的单项评价报告。在传统单项质量评价的基础上,利用层次分析法,给出各单项相对于整个井身质量评价的权重系数,将各个单项评价综合起来,系统地考虑各评价单项对井身质量的整体影响,实现了井身质量评价的综合化;利用模糊数学方法,将一些不易定量的评价单项定量化;在实现方式上,结合现代软件技术对数据进行计算处理,使得井身质量评价达到了高效、快速、准确,满足工程实际需求。 Traditional evaluations on well bore quality usually do the simple calculation of a large amount of measuring data, and then an individual evaluation report has been obtained from the comparison with every individual evaluation standard. Based on the traditional evaluation of the individual quality, the weight coefficient of every individual evaluation in the whole evaluation of the well bore quality is given by the use of step analysis method. And then all individual evaluations are integrated so that the influences of all individual evaluations on the whole well bore quality are taken into systematic consideration, thus realizing the integration of well bore quality evaluation. Meanwhile, some individual evaluations that are difficult to determine are quantified by means of fuzzy mathematic method. In the approach of implementing the above, modern software technologies are used to deal with data, which makes the well bore quality evaluation reach the goal of high efficiency, rapidity and accuracy, and also meet the practical demands of projects.
出处 《石油工业技术监督》 2008年第11期18-20,共3页 Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry
关键词 井身质量 质量评价 综合评价 模糊评价 well bore quality quality evaluation integration evaluation fuzzy evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献53

  • 1郭显光.一种新的综合评价方法──组合评价法[J].统计研究,1995,12(5):56-59. 被引量:194
  • 2杨纶标.模糊数学原理及应用[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,1993.129-150.
  • 3[1]Barzilai, J., "On the decomposition of value functions", Operations Research Letters,Vol. 22, pp159-170, 1998a.
  • 4[2]Barzilai, J., "Consistency measures for pairwise comparison matrices", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 7,pp1232-132, 1998b.
  • 5[3]Barzilai, J. and F. A. Lootsma, "Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative ahp and smart", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 6,pp155-165, 1997.
  • 6[4]Belton, V. and A. E. Gear, "On a short-coming of saaty's method of analytic hierarchies," Omega, Vol. 11, No. 3,pp228-230, 1983.
  • 7[5]Belton, V. and A. E. Gear, "The legitimacy of rank reversal - a comment", Omega, Vol.13, No. 3, pp143-144, 1985.
  • 8[6]Beynon, M. J., "An investigation of the role of scale values in the ds/ahp method of multi-criteria decision making", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11,pp327-343, 2002.
  • 9[7]Blair, A., R. Nachtmann, J. Olson, and T.Saaty, "Forecasting foreign exchange rates:an expert judgment approach",Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 21,No. 6, pp363-369,1987.
  • 10[8]Corbin, R., and A.A.J. Marley, "Random utility models with equality: an apparent,but not actual, generalization of random utility models", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 11, pp274-293, 1974.

共引文献51

同被引文献17

  • 1刘修善.井眼轨迹的平均井眼曲率计算[J].石油钻采工艺,2005,27(5):11-15. 被引量:21
  • 2李健,胡贯平,杨军.谈钻井井身质量的控制措施[J].石油工业技术监督,2006,22(3):42-43. 被引量:1
  • 3SY/T 5088-2008, 钻井井身质量控制规范[S].
  • 4WINTERS W J, DOIRON H H. The 1987 IADC fixedcutter bit classification system[R] . SPE 16142, 1987.
  • 5TEASDALE G. Adding up the glasgow coma score[J].Acta Neurochir,1979,28:13-16.
  • 6GAYNOR T, HAMER D. Quantifying tortuosities byfriction factors in torque and drag model[R] . SPE77617,2002.
  • 7CHEN D C-K ,GAYNOR T. Hole quality: gateway toefficient drilling[J] . OTC 14277,2002.
  • 8GAYNOR T, CHEN D C-K. Tortuosity versus microtortuosity-why little things mean a lot [R] . SPE67818,2001.
  • 9MASON C J, CHEN D C-K .The perfect wellbore[R] .SPE 95279,2005.
  • 10MASON C J, CHEN D C-K .Drilling metrics for improvedcasing ruing performance[R] . SPE 89912,2004.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部