关于诈骗犯罪量刑的思考

On the Discretionary of False Pretence

诈骗犯罪的定罪情节是犯罪人意图占有数额还是犯罪人实际占有数额,是存在争议的一个内容。主观主义者赞成前者,而客观主义者赞成后者。诈骗犯罪定罪情节的不同选择将影响构成犯罪的情形、犯罪既遂未遂的判定、量刑情节的选择,从而影响整个刑罚结构。实践证明,不论是单独采用犯罪人意图占有数额还是单独采用犯罪实际占有数额作为定罪情节,都不能够很好的定罪量刑。笔者建议同时将犯罪人实际控制数额和犯罪人意图控制数额作为定罪情节来量刑。

It＇s an argued question that the conviction plot of False Pretence is Uintent to occupied amount＂ or ＂actual occupied amount＂. The subjective doctrine approves the former, but the objective doctrine agrees with the latter. The conviction plots of False Pretence will influence many things, for instance, the action is legal or illegal; the crime is completed or uncompleted; which plots should be choose to decide the penalty, and so on. What＇s more, it will influence the whole penalty structure. It＇s proved to he not perfect only choosing the intention to occupied amount or the actual occupied amount. So the author suggests to choose both the intention to occupied amount and the actual occupied amount as conviction plots.