摘要
目的:通过观察移植肾PTC C4d沉积和嗜酸性粒细胞浸润与AHR的关系,探讨两者之间的相关性及其在诊断急性体液排斥中的作用。方法:采用间接免疫荧光法检测移植肾组织C4d沉积。26例移植肾PTC C4d弥漫性强阳性染色患者为C4d阳性组,而30例移植肾PTC C4d阴性患者为对照组。光镜下记数移植肾组织嗜酸性粒细胞数。结果:(1)26例C4d阳性患者中经病理诊断为AHR为13例,AHR+ACR为8例,ACR1为3例,ACR2为2例。30例C4d阴性患者中,AHR为1例,AHR+ACR为2例,ACR1为21例,ACR2为6例。与C4d阴性组相比,C4d阳性组难治性排斥患者较多,常需进一步干预性措施,且较多的患者对抗排斥治疗无反应,移植肾失功率高(7/26)。(2)C4d阳性组移植肾浸润嗜酸性粒细胞数亦明显高于C4d阴性组,两组相比差异显著(P<0.01)。C4d阳性无细胞性排斥组移植肾间质浸润嗜酸性粒细胞数与C4d阳性+ACR组相比差异无显著性(P>0.05)。C4d阳性ACR组移植肾间质浸润嗜酸性粒细胞数明显高于C4d阴性ACR组(P<0.05)。结论:移植肾PTC C4d沉积与嗜酸性粒细胞浸润密切相关,两者在肾移植AHR诊断过程中起重要作用。
Objective: To study the correlation between deposition of CAd along peritubular capillaries (PTC) and interstitial eosinophilic infdtration in renal allografts. Methods: Deposition of CAd in kidneys was assayed by indirect immunoflourescence of the renal allograft biopsies. Twenty-six patients were demonstrated strongly diffuse staining of PTC, who were defined as C4d^+ group, while the biopsies of thirty patients with acute rejection exhibited negative for FIE C4d staining served as the controls, who were defined as C4d^- group. Eosinophils were counted under microscope. Results: The C4d^- group was demonstrated significantly greater interstitial eosinophilic infiltration than did the C4d^- group( P 〈 0.01 ) ; Neuttophilic (PMN) infiltration of glomenali and PTC was also significandy greater in the C4d^+ group than in the C4d^- group( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: The results indicate a close association between PTC C4d deposition and eosinophilic infiltration and confirm previous observations regarding the correlation of PTC C4d staining and PMN infiltration.
出处
《中国免疫学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第11期1011-1013,1017,共4页
Chinese Journal of Immunology