论司法认知

On Judicatory Cognition

司法认知规则是证据法上一项重要的证据规则,具有免除当事人举证责任的效力。与他国相比较,我国关于司法认知的规定不仅零散、尚未形成体系,而且存在许多认识性的错误。我们认为,司法认知规则的运用紧密联系着双方当事人的诉讼权利,对司法认知规则的涵义、司法认知与相关免证事实的区别进行理论上的梳理极有必要;人民法院在认知过程中必须遵守合理的认知程序,以充分保障当事人的诉讼权利。

Judicatory cognition is an important evidence rule in evidence law, which works as the function to exempt the party's evidence onus probandi. Compared with other countries, the regulations about the judicatory cognition in our country is fragmentary and not systematic, above all with quite some cognitive errors. According to this paper, the application of the judicatory rule closely links with the litigation right of the party's on both sides, therefore, it is necessary to make a theoretical order about distinguishing one from another in the connotation of the judicatory cognition rule, judicatory cognition and relative evidence exempting, while, in the process of cognition, the people's court must obey the reasonable cognition procedure so as to fully protect the litigation right of the party.