期刊文献+

认知观照下的含义、显义区分 被引量:3

Implicature/Explicature Distinction: A Cognitive Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从隐喻和转喻的角度来审视含义和显义的区分,以便发现语用和认知研究相互兼容的结合点。探讨了impli-cature和explicature的基本概念及其汉语译法,然后提出概念映射应该列入显义推导的重要手段之一;运用Fauconni-er&Turner(1995)的心理空间理论来解释含义、显义的划分,以及隐喻和转喻在含义、显义生成过程中的作用。 This paper attempts to examine the relevance -theoretic implicature/explicature distinction in connection to metaphor and metonymy, in order to make both the pragmatic and the cognitive approaches compatible. First of all, we offered some basic knowledge about implicature and explicature, and discussed the translation of these two terms into Chinese as well. Then, we proposed that conceptual mappings have to be added to the list of explicature - deriving mechanisms. Finally, we explored the role of metaphor and metonymy in the production of explicatures and implicatures, in connection with Fauconnier & Turner' s theory of conceptual projection, within which the implicature/explicature distinction may find its place in Cognitive Linguistics.
作者 项成东
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期51-57,共7页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词 含义 显义 隐喻 转喻 概念映射 implicature explicature metaphor metonymy conceptual mapping
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Blakemore, D. Understanding Utterances [ M ]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992.
  • 2Bach, K. Conversational Implicature [ J ]. Mind and Language, 1994(9) : 124 - 162.
  • 3Carston, R. Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-theoretic semantics [ C ]// R. M. Kempson. Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1988 : 155 - 181.
  • 4Carston, R. Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed [ J ]. Linguitstische Berichte, 1997 ( 8 ) : 103 - 127.
  • 5Carston, R. Explicatare and Semantics [ J ]. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 2000( 12 ) : 1-44.
  • 6Carston, R. Thought and Utterances : The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [ M ]. Oxford : Blaekwell Publishers, 2002.
  • 7Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. Conceptual projection and middle spaces [ R ]. UCSD: Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. San Diego. [ http://www.warn. umd. edu/-return], 1994.
  • 8Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. Blending as a Central Process of Grammar [ C ]// A. Goldberg. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications, 1996 : 113 - 130.
  • 9Grice, H. P. Logic and conversation [C]//P. Cole & J. Morgan. Syntax and Semantics . New York: Academic Press, 1975:113 - 128.
  • 10Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live by [ M ]. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press,1980.

二级参考文献17

  • 1张辉 ,孙明智 .概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):1-6. 被引量:145
  • 2张辉,周平.转喻与语用推理图式[J].外国语,2002,25(4):46-52. 被引量:54
  • 3Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. Relevance: Cognition and Communication [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.
  • 4Carston, R. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics [A]. R. Kempson. Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 155-181.
  • 5Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live by [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 6Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 7Ruiz de Mendoza, E and J. L. Otal Campo. Metonymy, Grammar and Communication [M]. Granada, Spain: Editorial Comares, 2002.
  • 8Croft, W. and A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.
  • 9Carston, R. Thought and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
  • 10Carston, R. 1997. Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed [J]. Linguistische Berichte, (8): 103-127.

共引文献137

同被引文献26

  • 1刘正光.论转喻与隐喻的连续体关系[J].现代外语,2002,25(1):61-70. 被引量:109
  • 2张辉,蔡辉.认知语言学与关联理论的互补性[J].外国语,2005,28(3):14-21. 被引量:50
  • 3冉永平.词汇语用学及语用充实[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(5):343-350. 被引量:172
  • 4Barcelona, A. On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor [ C ]// A. Barcelona. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.
  • 5Blakemore, D. Understanding Utterances [ M ]. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1992.
  • 6Carston, R. Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-theoretic semantics [ C ]// R. M. Kempson. Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 7Carston, R. Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed [ J ]. Linguitstische Berichte, 1997 (8): 103-127.
  • 8Carston, R. Explicature and Semantics [ J]. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 2000 (12) : 1 -44.
  • 9Fauconnier, G. Mappings in Thought and Language [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 10Goossens, L. Metonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action [ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1990 (3) : 323 -340.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部