期刊文献+

“九一八”事变前后关于东北历史归属之争 被引量:1

The Dispute about Historical Belongingness of the Northeast of China before and after the Breakout of "the September 18th" Incident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "九一八"事变前后,日伪公然歪曲历史,提出东北是"独立国"的谬论。妄图以此为伪满的成立寻找历史依据,也为日本占领东北披上合法的外衣。对此,中国史学界广大仁人志士据理力争,除了揭示日伪反动言论的本质外,他们还按诸典籍,以历史文化为主要武器,并结合地理、法律等知识,论断和确认了东北是中国的神圣领土,从而有力地驳斥了日伪的反动谬论。 Before and after the breakout of the September 18th Incident,Japanese invaders and the Puppet government distorted history openly saying that Northeast of China was an "independent country" in order to search the historical basis for the establishment of Manchuria Puppet Government and Japanese occupation. Contrarily,Chinese history scholars used historical culture as the main weapons,combined with the geographical and legal knowledge to reveal the reactionary nature of remarks of Japanese and Puppets government and confirmed that Northeast China is the holy territory of China, which refuted the enemy's fallacy effectively.
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第6期122-125,共4页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 “九一八”事变 东北 历史归属 "the September 18th" Incident Northeast of China historical belongingness
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1徐正学,何新吾.国人对东北应有的认识[M].南京:东北问题研究社,1933.
  • 2章伯锋,庄建平.抗日战争:日伪政权与沦陷区:第6卷[M].成都:四川大学出版社,1997:2.
  • 3满洲建国之历史意义[N].盛京时报,1932-05-29.
  • 4满洲建国之历史意义[N].盛京时报,1932-05-30.
  • 5满洲建国之历史意义[N].盛京时报,1932-05-31.
  • 6满洲建国之历史意义[N].盛京时报,1932-06-01.
  • 7.
  • 8陈彬稣.告溥仪等国奸一群[N].申报,1932-03-12.
  • 9朱楔.日本侵略满蒙之研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1933.
  • 10傅斯年.东北史纲[M]//傅斯年全集:第2卷.长沙:湖南教育出版社,2003.

同被引文献188

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部