SCI检索下环境评价研究的文献计量学评估(1996-2005) 被引量：3

A Bibliometric Evaluation of Environmental Assessment-related Research in SCI from 1996-2005

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过对由SCI检索出的1996-2005年间所发表的1320篇以环境评价(EA)为主题词的论文文献进行计量学统计分析,探求EA研究现状和发展趋势。分析表明,近年来,EA研究保持着稳定的发展态势和对科学工作者持久的吸引力。环境科学、环境与工程是包括EA相关论文的主要分类目录,论文在不同期刊内呈分散分布,Environmental Management、Ecological Economics、Environmental Monitoring和Assessment等是主要的研究成果发表期刊。国际间合作成为主要的发展趋势,合作发表的论文在数量和影响力两方面都呈增长态势。另外,研究存在着区域间的不平衡,发达国家处于优势地位。不过,研究也显示了环境评价研究在获取学术资源方面有不容乐观的一面。 To determine the characteristics of scientific productivity of EA study, a bibliometric analysis of 1,320 EA-related papers in SCI from 1996-2005 was performed. The results indicate that EA-related studies have kept a steady increase since 1996, and EA was a popular topic for scientists. Environmental science and engineering ＆ environmental were the major subject categories of EA-related studies in SCI. The distribution of EA-related papers in journals was discrete. International collaboration was enhanced during the period of 1996-2005 on EA study, and obviously in- ternational co-authored papers were more visible than single-country papers. Developed countries have taken advantage to produce EA-related papers. There were three impeditive factors holding back the EA-Research： lack of continuity, low visibility and the difficulties they faced. Limitations of this bibliometric analysis are the ineompletion of original data and the bias.

作者侯小阁栾胜基杨志芃

机构地区北京大学环境科学与工程学院北京大学深圳研究生院城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第12期38-43,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金国家自然科学基金项目(40471052)

关键词文献计量学评估 SCI检索环境评价影响因子引用率 bibliometric evaluation environmental assessment SCI IF CPP

分类号 X3 [环境科学与工程—环境工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Schindler, D.W. The Impact statement Boondoggle [J]. Science, 1976:509.
2Sadler, B. International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment Final Report - Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance [R]. IAIA and CEA, Hull, Quebec, 1996.
3Petts, J. Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Volume 2, Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice: Impact and Limitations [M]. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1999:273-299.
4Bertlett, R.V. Policy and impact assessment: An introduction [J]. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 1988(6):73-74.
5Brunner, N. and Starkl, M. Decision aid systems for evaluating sustainability: A critical survey [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24 (4): 441-469.
6Kemm, J. The future challenges for HIA [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2005, 25(7-8): 799-807.
7Weaver, A. The Flip Side: A Vision for Impact Assessment in the 21st Century. Goodland, R., Anhang, J., IAIA Presidents vision for Impact Assessment: Where Will Impact Assessment Be in 10 Years and How Do We Get There? [C]. IAIA, Hong Kong, 2000:113-119.
8Fairthome, R.A. Progress in documentation-Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford - Zipf - Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction [J]. Journal of Documentation, 1969, 25 (4): 319-343.
9Chiu, W.T. and Ho, Y.S. Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003 [J]. Seientometries, 2005, 63 (1): 3-23.
10Chuang, K.Y., Huang, Y.L. and Ho, Y.S. A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan [J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72 (2): 201-212.