庄子的“彼此是非”是在认识论意义上说的吗

Are Zhuang Zi's "Bici Shifei" epistemological?

通行的观点认为,庄子在《齐物论》中谈到彼此是非的问题,是从认识论的角度谈的。这种观点将"彼此"理解为"那个认识主体、这个认识主体",将"是非"理解为"正确、错误"。但这样来解释庄子有关的话语是不通的。实际上,庄子的这段话是从本体论意义上说的:"彼此"是指"当下不存在的事物、当下存在的事物","是非"是指"存在、不存在",这样来解释庄子的这段话,意思十分清楚:它并非像人们通常所评价的那样是怀疑论和诡辩论,而是充满了辩证法。

It is commonly held that Zhuang Zi＇s ＂Bici Shifei＂ in his Qiwu Lun is made from the episte mologieal perspective. Such an understanding interprets Bici as ＂this epistemie subject and that epistemic subject＂, while taking Shifei as ＂right and wrong＂. However, such an interpretation is illogical. In fact, Zhuang ZiPs idea is ontological, with Bici referring to ＂what exists at present and what does not exist at present＂ and Shifei referring to ＂to exist and not to exist＂. Interpreted this way, Zhuang Zi＇s idea is clear., it is not skeptical and sophistic as usually evaluated, but rather rich in dialectics.