摘要
刘小春先生刊登了题为《自然体不能成为法律关系的主体》的文章,他的论据主要为:法律是人法;自然体成为法律主体会存在理论障碍;赋予自然体以主体权利,人类将面临多重困惑。笔者认为:以上论据不足以对自然体成为法律关系主体进行有力的否定,自然主体成为法律关系主体既存在着理论依据又具有历史必然性和现实必要性。
Liu Xiao-ehun published the article entitled "Nature can not be the subject of legal relation," whose main arguments were that the law is human being's law; if nature becomes law, there will be the main theoretical obstacles for the natural body becoming legal subject; if giving natural body the mankind's rights , human being will face Multiple confusion. The author believes that the above arguments can not deny that natural body can become the subject of legal relation, and natural body becoming the subject of legal relation not only has theoretical basis, but also has real possibility.
出处
《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》
2008年第4期24-28,共5页
Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
关键词
法律关系主体
自然体
可能性
后现代法学
subject of legal relation
natural body
possibility
post-modern jurisprudence