期刊文献+

中国学习者英语关系从句使用行为研究 被引量:26

A study of Chinese learners’ production of English relative clauses:Accessibility and embeddedness
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究通过实验数据分析和语料库数据调查,探讨了可及性和嵌入性对中国学习者英语关系从句使用行为的制约作用以及二者的相互关系。结果表明,可及性和嵌入性均在一定程度上影响学习者对不同类型关系从句的使用。就可及性而言,可及性高的关系从句使用频繁,正确率高;而可及性低的关系从句使用相对较少,容易出错。就嵌入性而言,中国学习者更多地将关系从句右置而非内嵌于主句中,且内嵌从句相较右置从句出错几率更高。本研究还发现,可及性和嵌入性两个因素呈互补态势,综而考之能够更好地解释不同类型关系从句的使用情况。 This paper reports on an experimental study and a corpus-based investigation, which aim to explore the effects of accessibility and embeddedness on Chinese EFL learners’ production of English relative clauses and the interrelationship between the two factors. Results show that both factors under investigation play an important role in Chinese EFL learners’ use of English relative clauses. With regard to accessibility, the learners at three different levels of English proficiency all exhibited a strong tendency to produce the more accessible type of relative clauses. Additionally, more errors occurred with the less accessible relative clauses as compared with those for the more accessible ones. In terms of embeddedness, the learners typically placed a relative clause in the matrix object position rather than the matrix subject position. They found it easier to produce the right-branching relative clause than the center-embedded equivalent. In general, accessibility and embeddedness interrelate in a complementary way and combine to afford a better account of Chinese learners’ tackling of different types of English relative clauses.
作者 李金满
机构地区 上海财经大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期406-414,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Bates, E., A. Devescovi & S. D'Amico. 1999. Processing complex sentences: A cross-linguistic study[J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 69-123.
  • 2Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition)[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • 3Comrie, B. & E. L Keenan. 1979. Noun phrase accessibility revisited [J]. Language 55: 649- 664.
  • 4Doughty, C. 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431-469.
  • 5Eckman, F. R., L. H. Bell & D. Nelson. 1988. On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language [J]. Applied Linguistics 9: 1-20.
  • 6Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 7Gass, S. 1979. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations [J]. Language Learning 29: 327-344.
  • 8Gass, S. 1980. An investigation of language transfer in adult second language learners [A]. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (eds.). Research in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Rowley: Newbury House, 132-141.
  • 9Gass, S. 1982. From theory to practice [A]. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (eds.). On TESOL' 81: Selected Papers [ C ]. Washington, DC : TESOL, 129-139.
  • 10Hawkins, J. A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars [J]. Language 75: 244-285.

二级参考文献62

  • 1王庆新.英语关系分句的定量分析[J].外国语,1993,16(6):51-55. 被引量:3
  • 2沈家煊.类型学中的标记模式[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(1):4-13. 被引量:177
  • 3张京鱼,张长宗,问小娟.有生性在中学生英语心理谓词习得中的认知作用[J].外语教学与研究,2004,36(5):351-356. 被引量:21
  • 4肖云南,吕杰.中国学生对英语关系从句习得的实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(4):259-264. 被引量:60
  • 5Diessel, H. & M. Tomasello. 2000. The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech [J ]. Cognitive Linguistics Ⅱ: 131-151.
  • 6Doughty, C. 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431-469.
  • 7Eckman, F. , L. Bell, & D. Nelson. 1988. On the gemeralization of relative clause instruction in the acquisi tion of English as a second language [J ]. Applied Linguistics 9 : 1-20.
  • 8Eisenberg, S. 2002. Interpretation of relative clauses by young children: another look [J ]. Journal of Child Language 29: 177-88.
  • 9Gass, S. 1979. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations [J]. Language Learning 29/2: 323-344.
  • 10Hamilton, R. 1994. Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativizationa second language [ J ]. Language Learning 44/1 : 123-157.

共引文献104

同被引文献283

引证文献26

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部