期刊文献+

卡泊芬净、伏立康唑序贯疗法与伊曲康唑完整疗程治疗52例恶性血液病患者继发侵袭性真菌感染的疗效比较 被引量:16

Comparison of the effect of intravenous caspofungin followed by voriconazole tablets and itraconazole with complete period treatment for anti-invasive-fungal therapy in 52 patients with malignant hematologic disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价卡泊芬净(caspofungin)静脉注射后口服伏立康唑(voriconazole)序贯治疗与伊曲康唑(itraconazole)完整疗程两种不同经验性抗真菌治疗方法在恶性血液病患者中的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析无锡市人民医院2005年1月至2008年4月间52例恶性血液病继发侵袭性真菌感染患者,根据不同抗真菌治疗方法分成两组,A组(22例)采用卡泊芬净静注后伏立康唑口服序贯疗法;B组(30例)采用伊曲康唑完整疗程治疗。观察两组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果A组的总有效率为81.8%(18/22),药物相关的不良反应发生率9.1%(2/22)。B组的总有效率63.3%(19/30),不良反应发生率16.7%(5/30)。两组总有效率均较高,但有显著性差异(P<0.05),A组不良反应率显著低于B组。结论两种方案对恶性血液病继发侵袭性真菌感染的患者均有效。卡泊芬净联合伏立康唑疗法比伊曲康唑完整疗程疗法更具有疗效优势,且安全性好,不良事件发生率低。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous caspofungin followed by voriconazole tablet and itraconazole with complete period treatment for antifungal therapy of malignant hemopathie patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was employed from January 2005 to April 2008 in Wuxi People's Hospital. Fifty-two patients with malignant hematologic disease infected by invasive fungal were divided into 2 groups according to the different anti-invasive-fungal therapy. Patients in Group A (22 cases)were administered with intravenous caspofungi followed by vorieonazole tablet sequential therapy, patients of Group B (30 cases) were administered with itraconazole with complete period treatment. Adverse events and the efficacy were investigated. Results The overall efficacy of A group was 81.8%(18/22), the incidence of ADR (adverse reactions rate) related to the drug was 9.1% (2/22). The total effective rate of Group B was 63, 3 % (19/30), the ADR was 16.7 % (5/30). Both these two groups had high overall effective rates, but the adverse reactions occurrence of Group A was lower than that of Group B(P〈0. 05). Conclusions Both the two regimens are effective for treating patients with malignant hematologic disease infected by invasive fungal. Caspofungin and voriconazole sequential therapy has more predominance in efficiency and safety than with itraconazole complete period treatment,the former has lower adverse reactions rates.
出处 《复旦学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期902-907,共6页 Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences
关键词 侵袭性真菌感染 卡泊芬净 伏立康唑 伊曲康唑 序贯治疗 invasive fungal infections caspofungin voriconazole itraconazole sequential therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Cornely OA, Ullmann AJ, Karthaus M. Evidence-based assessment of primary antifungal prophyIaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies [ J ]. Blood, 2003, 101 ( 9 ) : 3365 - 3372.
  • 2刘正印,王爱霞.抗真菌药物的研究进展[J].中国抗生素杂志,2006,31(2):69-71. 被引量:25
  • 3黄晓军.血液病/恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染的诊断标准与治疗原则(草案)[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(7):554-556. 被引量:423
  • 4MarrK A, Carter RA, Boeckh M, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in allogeneic stem-cell transplante recipients: changes in epidemiology and risk factors[J]. Blood, 2002,100 : 4358 - 4366.
  • 5Groll AH, Shah P, Mentzel C,et al. Trends in the postmortem epidemiology of invasive fungal infections at a university hospital[J]. J Infect, 1996,33:23 - 32.
  • 6Deresinski SC,Stevens DA. Caspofungin[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2003,36(11) :1445- 1457.
  • 7Abraham OC, Manavathu EK, Cutright JL, et al. In vitro susceptibilities of Aspergillus species to voriconazole, itraconazol, and amphotericin B [J]. Microbiol Infea Dis, 1999,33(1);7-11.
  • 8Maertens J, Raad I, Petrikkos G, et al, Efficacy and safety of caspofungin for treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2004.39 ( 11 ) : 1563 - 1571.
  • 9Candoni A, Mestroni R, Damiani D, et al. Caspofungin as first line therapy of pulmonary invasive fungal infections in 32 immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies [J]. Eur J Haematol,2005,75(3) :227 - 233.
  • 10Boogaerts M, Winston DJ, Bow EJ, et al. Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broadspectrum antibacterial therapy-A randomized,controlled trial [J]. Ann Intenr Med ,2001,135:412.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Ng A W, Wasan K M, Lopez-Berestetin G. Development posomal polyene antibiotics: an historical perspective [J].J Pharm Sci,2003,6:67.
  • 2Hitchcock C A, Pye G W, Oliver G P, et al. UK-109,496; a novel, wide-spectrum triazol derivative for the treatment of fungal infection: antifungal activity and selectivity in vitro [C]. Washington D C. Microbiology Asf. 35th Intersciences conference on antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1995.
  • 3Groll A H, Piscitelli S C, Walsh T J. Clinical pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents.. A comprehensive review of agents in clinical use, current investigational compounds, and putative targets for antifungal drug development [J]. Adv Pharmacol, 1998,44:343.
  • 4Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, et al, Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis [J]. N Engl J Med,2002,347:2020.
  • 5Verduyn Lunel F M, Meis J F, Voss A. Nosocomial fungal infections: candidemia [J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,1999,34:213.
  • 6Kullberg B J, Oude Lashot A M. Epidemiology of opportunistic invasive mycoses [J]. Eur J Med Re.s, 2002,7: 183.
  • 7Ellis M. Invasive fungal infections: evolving challenges for diagnosis and therapeutics [J]. Mol Immunol, 2001,38:947.
  • 8Mckinsey D S. Making best use of the newer antifungal drugs [J]. Infect Meal,2003,20:392.
  • 9Carrillo-Munoz A J, Quindos G, Tur C, et al. In vitro antifungal activity of liposomal nystatin in comparison with nystatin, amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate, liposoreal amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex,amphotericin B desoxycholate, fluconazole, and itraconazole [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1999,44: 397.
  • 10刘正印,王爱霞,盛瑞媛,谢秀丽,陈民钧.从99例败血症看院内感染的新动向[J].中华内科杂志,1998,37(5):323-326. 被引量:37

共引文献445

同被引文献142

引证文献16

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部