期刊文献+

家庭负担量表应用于血吸虫病调查的信度、效度及敏感性评价 被引量:3

Study on the reliability, validity and sensitivity of a Family Burden Scale used for evaluation on schistosomiasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价家庭负担量表(FBS)应用于血吸虫病患者家庭负担调查的信度、效度及敏感性。方法用FBS对224例血吸虫病患者进行现场调查。采用Cronbach’s α和折半信度评价量表的信度,因子分析法评价量表的效度,用方差分析比较不同收入水平患者的评分以评价量表的敏感性。结果量表的内容一致性较高,整个量表的Cronbach’s α和折半信度分别为0.874和0.939;量表各个维度的Cronbach’s α和折半信度大多在0.70以上;采用因子分析法,共提取6个公因子,累计贡献率为66.76%,基本证实了其结构效度;该量表能够区分不同收入水平患者家庭负担之间的差异(P〈0.001),证实其敏感性较好。结论FBS具有较好的信度、效度及敏感性,可用于血吸虫病患者的家庭负担调查。 Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of a Family Burden Scale (FBS) of disease used on schistosomiasis. Methods 224 schistosomiasis patients were investigated, using the FBS. Reliability was estimated by Cronbach' s α coefficient and split-half reliability. Validity was tested by factor analysis. Sensitivity was evaluated by comparison of patients with different income levels. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0. 874 and split-half reliability was 0. 939 for FBS, respectively. Most values of Cronbach's α and split-half reliability for each component of scale were above 0.70. Construct validity was appraised by factor analysis, and 6 factors were identified. These factors could explain 66.76 % of the total variance. Patients with different income levels showed significant difference in terms of family burden for schistosomiasis (P〈 0.001 ). Conclusion This FBS appeared to have satisfactory reliability, validity and sensitivity and could be used in evaluating family burden of schistosomiasis patients.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期1189-1192,共4页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 湖北省卫生厅血防科研联合攻关项目(XF06C30)
关键词 血吸虫病 家庭负担量表 信度 效度 敏感性 Schistosomiasis Family Burden Scale Reliability Validity Sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1World Health Organization. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. WHO,2003.
  • 2World Health Organization. The world health report 2003: shaping the future. WHO,2003.
  • 3Pal S. Impact of treatment intervention on the relationship between dimensions of clinical psychopathology, social dysfunction and burden on the family of patients. Psychol Med, 1982, 12: 651.
  • 4吕繁,曾光,钟天伦,肖勇.伤害家庭负担评价的方法学研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2001,22(4):246-248. 被引量:73
  • 5翟金国,赵靖平,陈晋东,刘庆海,张传芝,刘朝军.精神分裂症患者的家庭负担研究[J].上海精神医学,2006,18(4):233-235. 被引量:53
  • 6国家技术监督局,卫生部.中华人民共和国国有标准--日本血吸虫病诊断标准和处理GB15977-1995.
  • 7马文军,潘波.问卷的信度和效度以及如何用SAS软件分析[J].中国卫生统计,2000,17(6):364-365. 被引量:220
  • 8张文彤.SPSS11统计分析教程[M].北京:北京希望电子出版社,2002.171-177.

二级参考文献14

  • 1吕繁,顾瑗,刘小平.POMR及其在全科医疗中的应用[J].国外医学(医院管理分册),1994,11(4):145-148. 被引量:9
  • 2池桂波,王声湧.意外伤害的死亡率和潜在寿命损失年数的比较分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,1996,17(4):195-198. 被引量:79
  • 3卢文岱.SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1996..
  • 4卢文岱,SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术,1996年
  • 5Upton N,Reed V.The influence of social support on caregiver coping.Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res,2006,11(2):1256-1267
  • 6Lauber C,Eichenberger A,Luginbuhl P,et al.Determinants of burden in caregivers of patients with exacerbating schizophrenia.Eur Psychiatry,2003,18 (6):285-289
  • 7Hu TW.The economic burden of depression and reimbursement policy in the Asia Pacific region.Australas Psychiatry,2004,12 (Suppl):S11-S15
  • 8Vos T,Haby MM,Barendregt JJ,et al.The burden of major depression avoidable by longer-term treatment strategies.Arch Gen Psychiatry.2004 Nov;61(11):1097-1103
  • 9Murray-Swank AB,Lucksted A,Medoff DR,et al.Religiosity,psychosocial adjustment,and subjective burden of persons who care for those with mental illness.Psychiatr Serv,2006,57(3):361-365
  • 10Kris AE,Cherlin EJ,Prigerson H,et al.Length of Hospice Enrollment and Subsequent Depression in Family Caregivers:13-Month Follow-Up Study.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry,2006,14(3):264-269

共引文献403

同被引文献32

  • 1冯鹤声,王苏中,姚崇华,苏江莲,胡先芝.北京市安贞小区脑卒中危险因素的调查分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,1994,13(3):129-132. 被引量:37
  • 2张洁,钱序,陈英耀.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国卫生经济,2005,24(5):69-71. 被引量:67
  • 3翟金国,赵靖平,陈晋东,刘庆海,张传芝,刘朝军.精神分裂症患者的家庭负担研究[J].上海精神医学,2006,18(4):233-235. 被引量:53
  • 4WHO. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. WHO, 2003.
  • 5WHO. The world health report 2003 : shaping the future. WHO, 2003.
  • 6Murray CJ. Quantifying the burden of disease : the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull WHO, 1994, 72 (3) :429- 445.
  • 7King CH, Dickman K, Tisch DJ. Reassessment of the cost of chronic helmintic infection: a meta-analysis of disability-related outcomes in endemic schistosomiasis. Lancet, 2005,365 (9470) : 1561-1569.
  • 8Michaud CM, Gordon WS, Reich MR. The global burden of disease due to schistosomiasis. DCPP Working Paper, 2003 : 19.
  • 9中华人民共和国国家统计局.http://www.stats.gov.cn/.
  • 10柳群方,朱紫青,孟国荣,黄璧琨,王国宝.Morningside康复状态量表的信度和效度研究[J].上海精神医学,1998,10(3):147-149. 被引量:41

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部