摘要
目的:总结分析输尿管石街ESWL的技巧与方法,旨在提高其单纯ESWL的成功率。方法:将117例输尿管石街分为粉末型(26例),蛇头型(72例),石块型(19例)。不同类型的石街按不同治疗方法处理。结果:①粉末型石街长度≤5cm21例,仅药物对症排石治疗2周排净13例,4周排净8例;长度>5cm5例,ES-WL一次2周排净3例,4周排净2例。②蛇头型石街72例,其中ESWL一次2周排净38例,4周排净22例,3个月排净5例,有7例2周复查时行第二次ESWL,2~4周复查均排净。③石块型石街19例,ESWL一次2周排净3例,4周排净4例,3个月排净5例;其中有7例2周复查时行第二次ESWL,4周复查排净3例,4例行第三次ESWL,2例2个月排净,1例3个月复查排净,1例历时半年排净。上述117病例中有9例出现患侧肾绞痛或(和)发热、明显肉眼血尿,予抗炎解痉等对症治疗或感染控制后即予ESWL,症状均缓解或消失,余病例均无严重并发症。结论:ESWL治疗输尿管石街具有清除率高、损伤少、安全性高、并发症少、可重复治疗等优点,对于碎石机性能较好、ESWL技术成熟的医疗单位,尤其对于无腔内微创治疗条件的医院,目前仍可作为首选的治疗方法。
Objective:To summarize and analyze the skills and methods of ESWL treatment on ureteral stone street was to improve their success rate of only ESWL. Methods: 112 cases of ureteral stone street were divided into three types:(1)Powder-Street (26 cases); (2)Snakehead-Street (72 cases), (3)Block-Stone Street (19 cases). Different types of Stone Street were treated according to different methods by ESWL or only by drug therapy. Results.(1)Powder-Street had 26 cases, which the length was ≤ 5 cm had 21 cases, 13 cases lithecboled cleanly only by drug therapy in two weeks, 8 cases lithecboled cleanly in four weeks; which the length was 〉 5 cm had 5 cases, 3 cases lithecboled cleanly by ESWL once in two weeks, 2 cases in four weeks. (2)Snakeheads-Street had 72 cases, 38 cases lithecboled cleanly by ESWL once in two weeks , 22 cases in four weeks, 5 cases lithecboled cleanly by ESWL once in three months ,7 cases were taken the second ESWL in times of two weeks when returnvisited, all of 7 cases lithecboled cleanly in two weeks to four weeks. (3)Block-Stone Street had 19 cases , 3 cases lithecholed cleanly in two weeks by ESWL once , 4 cases in four weeks, 5 cases lithecboled cleanly in three months, 7 cases of which were taken the second ESWL in times of two weeks when returnvisited, another 4 cases were taken the third ESWL in times of four weeks, 2 cases litheeboled cleanly in two months , one case lithecboled cleanly in three months, and another one case until six months. 9 cases of all of the 117 cases had effected renal colic or (and) fever, obviously nakea hematuria, to be taken the symptomatic treatment such as anti-inflammatory spasm or to be taken the ESWL while the infection had been controled, symptoms were eased or disappeared, no serious cases complications. Conclusions: ESWL treated ureteral stone street with a high clearance rate, less injuries,high safety, less complications, and repetitiveness. If the medical units have a better lithotripster and technology, especially to the hospital has not minimally invasive treatment,still regards it as the preferred treatment.
出处
《临床泌尿外科杂志》
2008年第11期849-851,共3页
Journal of Clinical Urology