期刊文献+

ESWL治疗输尿管石街的研究 被引量:10

The experience of ESWL treatment on ureteral stone street
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结分析输尿管石街ESWL的技巧与方法,旨在提高其单纯ESWL的成功率。方法:将117例输尿管石街分为粉末型(26例),蛇头型(72例),石块型(19例)。不同类型的石街按不同治疗方法处理。结果:①粉末型石街长度≤5cm21例,仅药物对症排石治疗2周排净13例,4周排净8例;长度>5cm5例,ES-WL一次2周排净3例,4周排净2例。②蛇头型石街72例,其中ESWL一次2周排净38例,4周排净22例,3个月排净5例,有7例2周复查时行第二次ESWL,2~4周复查均排净。③石块型石街19例,ESWL一次2周排净3例,4周排净4例,3个月排净5例;其中有7例2周复查时行第二次ESWL,4周复查排净3例,4例行第三次ESWL,2例2个月排净,1例3个月复查排净,1例历时半年排净。上述117病例中有9例出现患侧肾绞痛或(和)发热、明显肉眼血尿,予抗炎解痉等对症治疗或感染控制后即予ESWL,症状均缓解或消失,余病例均无严重并发症。结论:ESWL治疗输尿管石街具有清除率高、损伤少、安全性高、并发症少、可重复治疗等优点,对于碎石机性能较好、ESWL技术成熟的医疗单位,尤其对于无腔内微创治疗条件的医院,目前仍可作为首选的治疗方法。 Objective:To summarize and analyze the skills and methods of ESWL treatment on ureteral stone street was to improve their success rate of only ESWL. Methods: 112 cases of ureteral stone street were divided into three types:(1)Powder-Street (26 cases); (2)Snakehead-Street (72 cases), (3)Block-Stone Street (19 cases). Different types of Stone Street were treated according to different methods by ESWL or only by drug therapy. Results.(1)Powder-Street had 26 cases, which the length was ≤ 5 cm had 21 cases, 13 cases lithecboled cleanly only by drug therapy in two weeks, 8 cases lithecboled cleanly in four weeks; which the length was 〉 5 cm had 5 cases, 3 cases lithecboled cleanly by ESWL once in two weeks, 2 cases in four weeks. (2)Snakeheads-Street had 72 cases, 38 cases lithecboled cleanly by ESWL once in two weeks , 22 cases in four weeks, 5 cases lithecboled cleanly by ESWL once in three months ,7 cases were taken the second ESWL in times of two weeks when returnvisited, all of 7 cases lithecboled cleanly in two weeks to four weeks. (3)Block-Stone Street had 19 cases , 3 cases lithecholed cleanly in two weeks by ESWL once , 4 cases in four weeks, 5 cases lithecboled cleanly in three months, 7 cases of which were taken the second ESWL in times of two weeks when returnvisited, another 4 cases were taken the third ESWL in times of four weeks, 2 cases litheeboled cleanly in two months , one case lithecboled cleanly in three months, and another one case until six months. 9 cases of all of the 117 cases had effected renal colic or (and) fever, obviously nakea hematuria, to be taken the symptomatic treatment such as anti-inflammatory spasm or to be taken the ESWL while the infection had been controled, symptoms were eased or disappeared, no serious cases complications. Conclusions: ESWL treated ureteral stone street with a high clearance rate, less injuries,high safety, less complications, and repetitiveness. If the medical units have a better lithotripster and technology, especially to the hospital has not minimally invasive treatment,still regards it as the preferred treatment.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2008年第11期849-851,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 体外冲击波碎石术 输尿管石街 ESWL Ureteral stone street
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Elashry O M, DiMeglio R B, Nakada S Y,et al.Intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral and renal calculi using small caliber (1.9F) electrohydraulic lithotripsy probes. J Urol, 1996,156:1581-1515.
  • 2[2]Peschel R, Janetschek G, Bartsch G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study. J Urol, 1999,162:1909-912.
  • 3[3]Pardalidis N P, Kosmaoglou E V, Kapotis C G. Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: ten years' experience. J Endourol, 1999,13:161-164.
  • 4[4]Park H, Park M, Park T. Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol, 1998,12:501-504.
  • 5[5]Tawfiek E R, Bagley D H. Management of upper urinary tract calculi with ureteroscopic techniques. Urology, 1999,53:25-31.
  • 6[6]Graff J, Pastor J, Funke P J, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases. J Urol, 1988,139:513-516.
  • 7[7]Liong M L, Clayman R V, Gittes R F, et al. Treatment options for proximal ureteral urolithiasis: review and recommendations. J Urol,1989,141:504-509.
  • 8[8]Yip S K, Lee F C, Tam P C, Leung S Y. Outpatient treatment of middle and lower ureteric stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1998,27:515-519.
  • 9[9]Pearle M, Blackstone S, Dunn M, Figenshau R, Sundarum C, McDougall E, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi. J Endourol, 1999,13(Suppl 1):A42.
  • 10[10]Coz F, Orvieto M, Bustos M, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol, 2000,14:239-246.

共引文献26

同被引文献51

引证文献10

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部