期刊文献+

腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术并发症的影响因素分析 被引量:9

Factors Influencing the Complications of Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术并发症的影响因素,为降低并发症的发生、提高手术疗效提供依据。方法回顾性研究2004年8月~2007年7月我院132例根治性腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术的临床资料,收集所有手术并发症病例,通过单因素和多因素统计分析筛选其危险因素。结果除5例术中采用手助方式外,余127例为腹腔镜辅助下低位直肠前切除术,无中转开腹。手术并发症发生率为20.5%(27/132),其中吻合口漏(8.3%,11/132)的发生率最高。二分类Logistic回归方程筛选得出肿瘤大小(直径≥3 cm)、肿瘤部位(距肛缘距离≤6 cm)和病理TNM分期为影响并发症发生的独立危险因素,相对危险度分别为1.149、0.552、2.816。结论手术并发症中吻合口漏的发生率最高;肿瘤大小、肿瘤部位和病理分期是影响手术并发症发生的独立危险因素。 Objective To analyze factors influencing the complications during and after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer, so that to improve the outcomes of the operation. Methods From August 2004 to July 2007, a series of 132 patients received laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer in our center. The data of the patients were analyzed and the records of intra- and post-operative complications were collected for univariate and multivariate statistical analysis to identify the risk factors for the complications. Results No conversion to open surgery occurred in the patients, while hand-assisted approach was used in 5. The overall morbidity rate was 20. 5% (27/132), among which the most common complication was anastomotic leakage (8.3%, 11/132). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the size ( 93 cm in diameter), location (distance between the tumor and the anal edge ≤6 cm), and TNM stage of the tumor were independent risk factors for the complications of laparoscopic low anterior resection (RR = 1. 149, 0. 552, and 2. 816 respectively). Conclusions Anastomotic leakage is the most common operative complication for laparoscopic low anterior resection. The size, location, and pathological stage are independent risk factors for the surgical complications.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2008年第12期1068-1070,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 低位前切除术 并发症 直肠癌 Laparoscopy Low anterior resection Complication Rectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46 : 601 - 611.
  • 2Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) : Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365 (9472) : 1718 - 1726.
  • 3Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(20) : 2050 -2059.
  • 4Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet, 2004, 363(9416) :1187 - 1192.
  • 5Kaiser AM, Kang JC, Chan LS, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2004, 14 (6) :329 - 334.
  • 6Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2006, 93:921 -928.
  • 7腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:271
  • 8Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2005, 92:211 -216.
  • 9Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, et al. Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg, 2006, 76:579-585.
  • 10Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, et al. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg, 2005, 241:9 - 13.

共引文献270

同被引文献87

引证文献9

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部