期刊文献+

认知神经和神经心理角度的多重类别学习系统 被引量:4

Multiple Systems of Category Learning From the Perspective of Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 归类是一项非常重要的认知技能,近十多年来归类的研究尤其关注类别学习的多重系统问题。本文回顾了近年来国外对类别学习的认知神经和神经心理研究,结果表明不同的类别学习任务下的学习机制和所依赖的神经生理基础是不同的,支持类别学习的多系统理论。 Categorization is a very important cognitive skill. During the last ten years, its most central topic was whether there was a single category learning system. We reviewed some researches by methods of cognitive neuroscience, and found that the learning mechanism and neurohiology patterns of category learning was not the same according to different learning tasks and supported the view of multiple category learning systems.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期1357-1360,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目招标课题(05JZD00034) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2004年度重大研究项目(05JJDXLX005)
关键词 单类别学习系统 多重类别学习系统 认知神经 神经心理 Single system of category learning, Multiple systems of category learning, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1莫雷,陈战胜.规则策略和样例策略在归类过程中的运用[J].心理学报,2003,35(1):29-36. 被引量:18
  • 2Keri S, Kelemen O, Benedek G. Intact prototype learning in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res, 2001, 52(3): 261-264
  • 3Squire L R, Knowlton B J. Learning about categories in the absence of memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995, 92 : 12470 - 12474
  • 4Reber P J, Squire L R. Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. Behavioral Neuroscience 1999, 113 : 235 - 242
  • 5Reber P J, Stark CEL, Squire L R. Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory. Learning& Mem, 1998, 5: 420- 428
  • 6Aizenstein H J, MacDonald A W, Stenger V A, et al. Complementary category learning systems identified using event-related functional MRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscienee 2000,12 (6):977 - 987
  • 7Keri S, Kalman J, Rapcsak S Z, Antal A, et al. Classification learning in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 1999, 122 : 1063 - 1068
  • 8Konishi S, Karwazu M, Uchida I, et al.1999. Contribution of working memory to transient activation in human inferior prefrontal cortex during performance of the Wisconsin Card SortingTest. Cerebral Cortex , 1999, 9 (7): 745-753
  • 9Young D A, Freyslinger M G. Scaffolded instruction and the remediation of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test deficits in ehronic schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 1995 (16):199 - 207
  • 10Ashby F G, Noble S, Filoteo J, et al. Category learning deficits in Parkinson' s disease. Neuropsychology, 2003, 17: 115- 124

二级参考文献90

  • 1[46]Allman J M, et al. The anterior cingulate cortex. The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2001, 935:107~117
  • 2[47]Vogt B A, Finch D M, Olson C R. Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cerebral Cortex, 1992, 2:435~443
  • 3[48]Hohnsbein J, Falkenstein M, Hoorman J. Error processing in visual and auditory choice reaction time tasks. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1989, 3:32
  • 4[49]Gehring W, Goss B, Coles M G H, et al. A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 1993, 4:385~390
  • 5[50]Carter C S, Braver T S, Barch D M, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 1998, 280:747~749
  • 6[51]Pardo J V, Pardo P J, Janer K W. The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1990, 87:256~259
  • 7[52]Bench C J, et al. Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia, 1993, 31:907~922
  • 8[53]Carter C S, Mintun M, Cohen J D. Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. NeuroImage, 1995, 2:264~272
  • 9[54]Buckner R L, Petersen S E, Ojemann J G, et al. Functional anatomical studies of explicit and implicit memory retrieval tasks. The Journal of Neuroscience, 1995, 15(1 Pt 1):12~19
  • 10[55]Demb J B, Desmond J E, Wagner A D, et al. Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 1995, 15:5870~5878

共引文献163

同被引文献62

  • 1邢强,孙海龙,车敬上.观察学习与反馈学习方式对类别学习的影响[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,13(12):17-22. 被引量:7
  • 2陈英和,王明怡.工作记忆广度对儿童算术认知策略的影响[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(2):29-35. 被引量:12
  • 3张奇,刘万伦.类别学习多重系统理论的研究与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):78-87. 被引量:5
  • 4Ashby, F. G” Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U.,&Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory ofmultiple systems in category learning. PsychologicalReview, 105, 42-481.
  • 5Ashby, F. G” Ennis, J. M., & Spiering, B. J. (2007). Aneurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptualcategorization. Psychological Review, 114(3), 632-656.
  • 6Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2011). Human categorylearning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1224, 147-161.
  • 7Ashby, F. G., & O’Brien, J. R. B. (2007). The effects of positiveversus negative feedback on information-integration categorylearning. Perception & psychophysics, 69, 865-878.
  • 8Calabresi, P., Picconi, B” Tozzi,A” & Di Filippo, M. (2007).Dopamine-mediated regulation of corticostriatal synapticplasticity. Trends in Neurosci^ncQS, 30, 211-219.
  • 9DeCaro, M. S” Thomas, R. D., & Beilock, S. L. (2008).Individual differences in category learning: Sometimesless working memory capacity is better than more.Cognition, 107, 284-294.
  • 10Dunn, J. C” Newell, B. R., & Kalish, M. L. (2012). Theeffect of feedback delay and feedback type on perceptualcategory learning: The limits of multiple systems. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognition, 55(4), 840-859.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部