期刊文献+

同伴互动类型对三年级小学生写作水平的影响 被引量:5

The Effects of Types of Peer-Interaction on Pupils' Writing Quality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究通过对比同伴辅导、合作、协作等三种同伴互动写作方式与个体化写作教学干预前后,三年级学生独立写作水平的变化,了解同伴互动类型对初学者写作水平的影响。结果发现,和个体化写作相比,三种同伴互动写作方式均更有利于整体写作水平和"结构"维度写作水平的提高;但合作写作最为突出,不仅在各个维度都优于个体化写作,而且在"选材"维度上还优于同伴辅导写作和协作写作。这说明,社会性互动有利于初学者写作水平的提高,且主要表现为提升记叙文的结构完整性和层次清楚性;但只有兼顾"个人责任"和"高平等性、相互性",社会性互动对写作的促进作用才能更加充分地发挥。 The present study investigated the effects of peer-tutoring writing, cooperative writing writing, collaborative writing and individualistic writing on pupils' writing quality. 239 third grade students in 5 classes took part in the study. Each class was randomly assigned to one of the four writing instructional models while two classes were assigned to collaborative writing. Pre- and post- assessments of independent writing were taken. The results showed that (1) all the three types of peer-interactive writing showed significantly greater pre-post gain in the dimension of Structure than individualistic writing. (2) cooperative writing showed significantly greater pre-post gain in all dimensions than individualistic writing, and it was the most efficacious instruction model in improving the dimension of material.
作者 伍新春 管琳
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期1361-1364,1352,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 全国教育科学规划课题(EBA010432)的成果之一
关键词 同伴辅导写作 合作写作 协作写作 写作水平 Peer-tutoring Writing, Cooperative Writing, Collaborative Writing, Writing Quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Graham S, Perin D. A meta - analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007, 99(3): 445-476
  • 2Johnson D W, Johnson R T. Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning(5th edition). Boston : Allyn & Bacon, 1999
  • 3McCarthey S J, McMahon S. From convention to invention: three approaches to peer interactions during writing. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz eds. Interaction in cooperative groups: the theoretical anatomy of group learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995 : 17 - 35
  • 4Saddler B, Graham S. The effects of peer - assisted sentence - combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, 97(1): 43-54
  • 5Yarrow F, Topping K J. Collaborative writing: the effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, 71 (3): 261 - 282
  • 6Graham S, Harris K, Mason L. Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self- efficacy of struggling young writers: the effects of self - regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2005, 30(2): 207-241
  • 7Harris K, Graham S, Mason L. Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self- efficacy of struggling young writers: the effects of self- regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American educational research journal, 2006, 43(2) : 295 - 340
  • 8Hidi S, Berndorff D, Ainley M. Children's argument writing, interest and self-efficacy: an intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 2001(12): 429- 446
  • 9Coogan D. Email " tutoring " as collaborative writing. In: Hobson E H, eds. Wiring the Writing Centre. Salt Lake City: Utah State University Press, 1998:25 -43

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部