期刊文献+

克林霉素诱导实验在金黄色葡萄球菌药物敏感实验中的应用 被引量:4

Survey of Inducible Clindamycin Resistant in Staphylococcus aureus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对金黄色葡萄球菌诱导克林霉素耐药的研究,为临床使用红霉素和克林霉素提供可靠的实验依据。方法应用MicroScan WalkAway-96SI微生物鉴定系统鉴定MRSA和MSSA和药敏试验。根据NCCLS 2004年版"增加对检测诱导克林霉素耐药的注释"对红霉素耐药,克林霉素敏感菌进行D-试验。结果242例金黄色葡萄球菌,MRSA占42%(101/242),MSSA占58%(141/242),红霉素和克林霉素耐药率分别为78.5%(191/242)、60.7%(147/242),二者同时耐药(结构型MLSB耐药)的菌株占60.7%(147/242),242株金黄色葡萄球菌D-试验阳性占所检测菌株的14.9%(36/242);43株红霉素耐药而克林霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌D-实验结果:阳性率为83.7%(36/43)。结论临床应常规检测金黄色葡萄球菌诱导型克林霉素耐药,避免盲目使用克林霉素而导致治疗失败。 Objective To research Staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant, so as to provide more reliable evidence for the clinical rational use of antibiotics guide treatment. Method MicroScan WalkAway- 96SI Microbial Identification System were used for identification and sensitivity of MRSA and MSSA. According to the notes of NCCLS 2004 edition, "to increase the detection of induced resistance of clindamycin", erythromycin resistance but clindamyein sensitive bacteria were done D-test. Results Of 242 strains Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA accounted for 42% ( 101/242 ), MSSA accounted for 58% ( 142/242), erythromycin and elindarnycin resistance rates were 78.5% (191/242) and 60. 7% ( 147/242), while the resistance to the both drugs (MLS-resistant structure ) accounted for 60. 7% (147/242). Inducible elindamycin resistance (D-test positive) strain accounted for 14.9% (36/242). And in 43 strains which were resistant to erythromycin and sensitive to elindmycin, 36 strains were D-test positive, and the positive rate was 83.7%. Conclusion The clinical testing of Staphylococcus aureus should conduct routinly inducible elindamycin resistance test to avoid irrational use of antibiotics.
出处 《预防医学情报杂志》 CAS 2008年第12期981-983,共3页 Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
关键词 金黄色葡萄球菌 红霉素 克林霉素 耐药 D-试验 Staphylococcus aureus Erythromycin Clindamycin Resistance D-test
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献51

  • 1陈民钧.美国临床实验室标准化委员会2004年版有关药敏试验标准化更新要点[J].中华检验医学杂志,2004,27(9):608-610. 被引量:74
  • 2沈定霞,罗燕萍,徐雅萍,张秀菊,周光.葡萄球菌对红霉素和克林霉素的诱导耐药性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):400-402. 被引量:114
  • 3Walsh FM,Sebastian GB.Microbiology and drug resistance mechanisms of fully resistant pathogens[J].Curr Opin Microbiol,2004,7(4):439-444.
  • 4Ip M,Lyon D,Leung T,et al.Macrolide resistance and distribution of erm and mef genes among beta-haemolytic Streptococci in Hong Kong[J].Eur J Clin Microbiol & Infectious Diseases,2002,21(3):238-240.
  • 5Shoemaker N B,Vlamakis H,Hayes K,et al.Evidence for extensive resistance gene transfer among Bacteriodes spp.and among Bacteriodes and other genera in the human colon[J].App Environ Microbiol,2001,67(2):561-568.
  • 6Schmitz FJ,Verhoef J,Fluit AG.Prevalence of resistance to MLS antibiotics in 20 European university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY surveillance programme[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2001,47(2):239-240.
  • 7Gao Y.Glycopeptide antibiotics and development of inhibitors to overcome vancomycin resistance[J].Nat Prod Rep,2002,19(1):100-107.
  • 8Sieradzki K,Markiewicz Z.Mechanism of Vancomycin resistance in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J].Polish J Microbiol,2004,53(4):207-214.
  • 9Parenti F,Schito GC,Courvalin P.Teicoplanin:Chemistry and microbiology[J].J Chemother,2000,12(Suppl 5):5-14.
  • 10Schaison G,Graninger W,Bouza E.Teicoplanin in the treatment of serous infection[J].J Chemother,2000,12(Suppl 5):S26-S33.

共引文献137

同被引文献31

  • 1葛德珊,冼翠琴,黄玉环.肠杆菌科细菌的耐药性变迁[J].国际医药卫生导报,2005,11(4):94-95. 被引量:2
  • 2沈定霞,罗燕萍,徐雅萍,张秀菊,周光.葡萄球菌对红霉素和克林霉素的诱导耐药性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):400-402. 被引量:114
  • 3段颖卿,舒向荣,江莎莎.金黄色葡萄球菌“D-试验”阳性率调查及其临床意义[J].江西医学检验,2006,24(1):25-26. 被引量:6
  • 4金炎,王嘉.310株葡萄球菌对红霉素和克林霉素耐药情况分析[J].山东医药,2006,46(23):48-49. 被引量:2
  • 5Venkatesh MP,Placencia F,Weisman LE.loagulase-negative staphylo-coccal infections in the neonate and child anupdate[J].Semin-Pedi-atr-infect-Dis,2006,17(3):120.
  • 6CLSI.Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing;Fourteenth Informational Supplement[S].M100-S14,2004.
  • 7Drinkovic DE,Fuller KP, Shore Dj, et al. Clindamycin treat-ment of Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible lindomycinresistance[J], J Antimicrob Chemother,2001,48: 315 — 7.
  • 8Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, MeElmeel ML, et al. Practicaldisk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resist-ance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative taphylococci[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2003,41: 4740.
  • 9CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tes-ting; Fourteenth Informational Supplement [ S] . M100-S14,2004.
  • 10Swenson JM,Brasso WB, Ferraro MJ, et al. Detection of induc-ible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci by broth microdilutionusing erythromycin-clindamycin combination wells[J]. J Clin Mi-crobiol, 2007 , 45(12) : 3954 — 7.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部