“酌”与“正”的困惑——从阐释学的角度看《文心雕龙·正纬》篇

The Perplexity of Deliberating and Correcting——Review on The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons: Correcting Latitude from the Perspective of Hermenentik

阐释学在中国有着悠久的历史。对经的阐释最能体现中国阐释学最重要的特征:神秘性、实用工具性及矛盾性。这种神秘性、实用工具性与矛盾性正体现在《文心雕龙》所提及到的谶纬对经的阐释现象上。正是基于谶纬这种阐释特征导致经在接受史上的异质化,刘勰于《文心雕龙》中特置《正纬》篇以矫其陋漏。但是,由于刘勰思想的内在局限性致使他未能真正地批其纰谬。对此,从谶讳对经的阐释所运用的哲学依据、形态类型、阐释的社会效果史诸方面来考究,便可揭示出刘勰《正纬》篇的内在局限性。

Hermenentik has a long history in China. The expounding of classics can incarnate the most important characteristics of Chinese Hermenentik, that is, mystique, practicality and contradictoriness, which are embodied just in the expounding of classics in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons. Based on the variability of classics＇ reception caused by the characteristics of the expounding of classics, LIU Xie wrote Correcting Latitude in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons to correct the errors of the augury. However, because of the intrinsic limitation of LIU Xie＇s idea, he did not criticize the mistake validly. This paper tries to explore the intrinsic perplexity of Correcting Latitude based on philosophy, types and social effect history of the expounding of classics.