伽利略科学方法与培根、笛卡尔哲学方法之比较

The comparison of methods between Galileo scientific and Bacon,Cartesian philosophy

为了反对亚里士多德哲学教条,颠覆性地击败中世纪以来的教会权威,培根、笛卡尔、伽利略分别从不同的角度建构各自的方法论体系,以探寻自然之确切性、真理性知识。但培根、笛卡尔的方法各有偏颇,而伽利略数学实验方法,作为探寻自然知识的有效方法,推动近现代自然科学大踏步前进,且在方法论上实现了探寻自然知识的革命性变革。

To fight against Aristotle＇s doctrine and defeat radically Christian authority since Middle Ages, Bacon, Descartes and Galileo constructed different methodological systems respectively in different perspectives to seek reliable and truthful knowledge. However, there are different bias in the methodology of Bacon and Descartes, but Galileo＇s methodology of mathematical experiment, as effective methodology to seek natural knowledge,spur modern natural science development in a high speed. The radical revolution of seeking natural knowledge comes true in methodology .