期刊文献+

美国联邦政府关于科研不端行为的政策演变--从不端行为定义的争议与统一过程审视 被引量:11

The Evolvement of Policies on Research Misconduct in the American Federal Government:Scanning from the Disputed and Unified Process of the Misconduct Definitions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自关于科研不端行为的首个联邦部门规章于1989年制定并实施,直至统一的联邦法规——《关于研究不端行为的联邦政策》于2000年12月6日公告生效之前的12个年头里,美国政府各部门和机构的政策法规中,有关科研不端行为的定义一直是"各自为政"、"争执不停"。研究结果发现:美国联邦政府各部门和机构关于不端行为定义的争议与统一过程,蕴涵着并影射出联邦政府关于科研不端行为政策的演变轨迹和统一趋势。 During the twelve years from the establishment and implement of the first Federal department's regulation on research misconduct in 1989,to being noticed and effective of the unified Federal code of the Federal Policy on Research Misconduct on December 6,2000,'each does things in his own way' and 'continual disputes' on the definitions of research misconduct have been in existence among the Federal departments and agencies. The research result showed: the disputed and unified process of the research misconduct definitions among the Federal departments and agencies,contained and reflected the track of the policy evolvement and the unified trend of the Federal government on research misconduct.
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期53-57,共5页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 2007年国家自然科学基金委软科学研究计划重点项目--“科学基金监督体系的国际比较和实证研究”(L0722105)子项目“科研不端行为的监督机制:国际比较与对策研究” 2007年国家软科学研究计划面上项目“构建和谐社会的科技支撑体系研究”(2007GXQ4B109) 2007年湖南省社科基金一般项目“科研道德建设:国际比较与对策研究”(07YBB037)
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 142 C. F.R. Part 50. subpart A :August 8,1989.
  • 2National Science Foundation (1991) : Misconduct in Science and Engineering: Final Rule. Federal Register 56( May 14) :22286 - 22290.
  • 3Kenneth D. Pimple. Defining Misconduct in Science : Some Reflections on the American Experience, http://www. indiana. edu/poynter/tre4 - 2a. html
  • 4Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 2, 1. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulic Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/documents/report-commission. pdf.
  • 5Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 15. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulie Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/doeuments/report-eommission. pdf.
  • 6Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 15-17. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulie Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/doeuments/report-eommission. pdf.
  • 7Ralph A. Bradshaw. FASEB Letter to Donna Sha/a/a 7.2.96. http://www .faseb. org/opa/hhslet2. html( 1 of 3) 12/21/2005 11:27 : 16 AM
  • 8USDA Forest Service Research & Development. Code of Scientific Ethics. July 20, 2000, pages 9- 10.
  • 9The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 235/ Wednesday, December 6, 2000/Notices, pages 76260.
  • 10The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 235/ Wednesday, December 6, 2000/Notices, pages 76262.

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部