期刊文献+

开放式吸痰法对肺不张患者呼吸循环参数的影响 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究开放式吸痰法对肺不张患者呼吸循环参数的影响。方法选择11例肺不张并机械通气的危重患者,观察吸痰前1min及吸痰后3、20min患者的呼吸(RR)、心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、气道峰压(Ppeak)、平台压(Pplat)和潮气量(VT)情况。结果与吸痰前1min相比,吸痰后3min的SBP、HR、RR、Ppeak、Pplat均显著增高(<0.05),SpO2显著下降(<0.05);吸痰后20min,RR仍显著增高(<0.05)。结论开放式吸痰法会明显影响肺不张患者的呼吸循环参数及气道压力的稳定性,对患者病情不利。护理过程中,应重视吸痰引起的继发性损害,加强吸痰前后呼吸循环等参数的监测。
出处 《现代实用医学》 2008年第11期879-880,共2页 Modern Practical Medicine
基金 浙江省舟山市卫生局科研基金项目 编号04B006
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Wickerts CJ, Blomqvist H, Baehrendtz S, et al. Clinical application of differential ventilation wich selective positive endexpiratory pressure in adult respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scat'A,1995,39 (3):307-311.
  • 2Cereda M, Villa F, Colombo E, et al. Closed suctioning maintains lung volume during volume-controlled mechanical[J]. Intensive Care Med,2001,27(3):648-654.
  • 3尹利华,王建荣,张利岩,张健鹏.密闭式吸痰研究进展[J].南方护理学报,2005,12(4):13-15. 被引量:73

二级参考文献13

  • 1Wainwright SP, Gould D. Endotracheal suction: an example of the problems of relevance and rigour in clinical research[ J ]. Journal of Clinical Nursing,1996,5(6):389-398.
  • 2A. Topeli, A. Harmanci, Y. Cetinkaya, et al. Comparison of the effect of closed versus open endotracheal suction systems on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J].Journal of Hospital Infection, 2004,58:14-19.
  • 3C. C. Freytag, F. L. Thies. Prolonged application of closed in-line suction catheters increases microbial colonization of the lower respiratory tract and bacterial growth on catheters surface[J]. Infection,2003,31(1):31-37.
  • 4Salvatore M. Maggiore, Francois Lellouche, Jerome Pigeot, et al. Prevention of endotracheal suction-induced alveolar derecruitment in acute lung injury[J]. American Journal of Respiratory and Grit Care Medieine,2003,167(9):1215-1224.
  • 5Maurizio Cereda, Federico Villa, Enrico Colombo, et al.Closed system endaotracheal suctioning maintains lung volume during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation[J].Intensive Care Med,2001,27:64-654.
  • 6Angela Kalyn, Sandra Feuerstake, Bosco Paes, et al. Closed suction of intubated neonates maintains better physiologic stability: a randomized trial[J]. Journal of Perinatoligy,2003, 23:218-222.
  • 7Leandro Cordero, MD, Mercedes Sananes, et al. Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants[ J ]. Journal of Perinatology,2000, 3:151-156.
  • 8Johnson KL, Kearney PA, Johnson SB, et al. Close versus open endotracheal suction: Costs and physiologic consequences[J].Crit Care Medicine, 1994, 22(4):658-666.
  • 9Birgitta Almgren, RN,Carl-Johan Wickerts,et al. Side effect of endotracheal suction in pressure and volume controlled ventilation[ J ]. Chest, 2004, 125(3): 1077-1080.
  • 10Stenqvist, S. Lindgren, S. Karason, et al. Warning! Suction. A lung model evaluation of closed suction system[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2001,45:167-172.

共引文献72

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部