摘要
康熙九年(1670),计东两次写信给吴伟业,先对吴氏《复社纪事》一文提出严厉批评,认为该文为小人提供了"坐复社诸公以党人亡国之罪"的借口,再对《梅村集》的编排体例表示不同看法。从该信涉及的有关史实来看,吴伟业对复社地位、价值、历史影响的认识,远远超过了计东。但计东对《梅村集》编排体例的批评,则被吴伟业虚心接受。
Ji Dong wrote two letters to Wu Weiye in 1670. At first, he sharply criticized Wu Weiye＇s Annals of Fu She. He held that this article provided an excuse that ＂the members of Fu She caused the state to perish＂. Then, he gave a different opinion on the layout format of Collection of Meicun. From the related historical fact of the letter, Wu Weiye＇s understanding on Fu She＇s status, historical value and influence far exceeded Ji Dong. And the criticism about the layout format was accepted by Wu Weiye.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
CSSCI
2008年第4期86-91,共6页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
