《中华儿科杂志》未被引文章分析

Analyses on non-citation of articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics

将《中华儿科杂志》2005年全年发表的353篇论文逐一在清华同方引文数据库检索(检索日期截至2007年10月7日),其中40.5%的文章从未被引用过。诊断标准类文章均被引用,是刊载文章中唯一100%被引用的栏目;论著类文章未被引比例较低(15.4%);15篇述评、专论类文章中4篇未被引用(26.7%),其中2篇外籍专家述评稿件均未被引用;病例报告、临床病例讨论、临床经验交流栏目文章未被引用率分别为87.0%、80.0%、29.3%;答疑、争鸣、讨论类文章未被引比例较高(80.0%)。通过对未被引文章的深入剖析,旨在为国内医学期刊编辑工作实践提供依据。

All of the 353 articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics in 2005 were searched using Tsinghua Tongfang Citation Database by 7th October of 2007. Among these articles 40.5% had not yet been cited. Standard of Diagnosis was the only column that all articles had been cited. Level of non-citation of original articles was very low （ 15.4% ）. Of all reviews and special articles only four had not been cited （26.7%） , including two foreign experts＇. Non-citation rate of Case Report, Clinical Case （Pathological） Discussion and Clinical Experience was 87. 0%, 80. 0% and 29.3%. Articles of Opinion/Debate/Discussion column were seldom cited and non-citation rate was 80. 0%. These analyses provide a reference for the editing work of domestic medical journals.