期刊文献+

常用颌骨矢状向位置关系评价指标的准确性和可靠性分析 被引量:5

Accuracy and Reliability Analysis of Commonly Used Cephalometric Norm of Anteroposterior Skeletal Occlu-sion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析常用颌骨矢状向位置关系评价指标的准确性和可靠性。方法选择恒牙期208名患者的数码X线头颅定位侧位片和面部正侧位照片进行颌骨矢状向位置关系(骨性Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类)评判,并以此为标准对ANB角、APDI值、Wits值和A点凸度分别在骨性Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类错畸形中进行分析,并对以上4项测量指标进行相关分析。结果ANB角、APDI值、Wits值和A点凸度在骨性Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类错畸形中均具有显著性差异,APDI的变异系数较小,其余3项的变异系数波动较大。ANB角、APDI值、Wits值和A点凸度4项测量指标均具有高相关性。结论ANB角、APDI值、Wits值和A点凸度4项测量指标在评价骨性Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类错畸形时均具有一定的准确性,而APDI值的可靠性更好,并提示多项测量指标均指示为同一类错畸形时,结果的可靠性更高。 Objective To analyze the accuracy and reliabihty of commonly used cephalometric norm of anteroposterior skeletal occlusion. Methods 208 lateral cephalograms of patients with permanent occlusions were divided into skeletal Class Ⅰ, skeletal Class Ⅱ, and skeletal Class Ⅲ by lateral cephalograms and facial photos. Four items including ANB, APDI, Wits and A convexity were measured by independent sample t-test and coeiffient of variation in skeletal Class Ⅰ, skeletal Class Ⅱ, and skeletal Class Ⅲ respectively. Meanwhile, the coeificient of correlation between ANB, APDI, Wits and A convexity were determined. Results Significant differences were found in skeletal Class Ⅰ, skeletal Class Ⅱ, and skeletal Class Ⅲ using ANB, APDI, Wits and A convexity as cephalometric norm of anteroposterior skeletal occlusion respectively. The coefficient of variation of APDI was minor compared with other three measurements. All measurements had significant association with each other by Pearson correlation analysis. Conclusion It is accurate to use ANB, APDI, Wits and A convexity as cephalomettic norm of anteroposterior skeletal occlusion in skeletal Class Ⅰ, skele'tal Class Ⅱ, and skeletal Class Ⅲ. However, the values of APDI are more reliable as cephalometric norm and will improve the reliability by measuring a tew cephalometric values of anteroposterior skeletal occlusion.
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期852-854,共3页 Journal of China Medical University
基金 辽宁省教育厅青年基金资助项目(05L540)
关键词 正畸学 上颌骨 下颌骨 头影测量 orthodontics maxilla mandible cephalometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1HOUSTON WJ, LEE RT. Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1985,7(2) : 127-135.
  • 2袁虹,傅民魁.中国成人正常牙合ODI、APDI值的测量[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2000,14(1):43-44. 被引量:21
  • 3ANDERSON G,FIELDS HW,BECK M,et al. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach [J]. Angle Orthod,2006,76(4) : 612-618.
  • 4ARAI Y,TAMMISALO E,IWAI K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1999,28 ( 4 ) : 245-248.
  • 5LAGRAVERE MO, CAREY J,TOOGOOD RW,et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,134( 1 ) : 112-116.
  • 6HASHIMOTO K,KAWASHIMA S,ARAKI M,et al. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row muhitector helical CT [J]. Oral Science, 2006,48 ( 1 ) 27-34.

二级参考文献1

共引文献20

同被引文献38

  • 1郭杰,王春玲,陈扬熙.山东地区成人正常颅颌面X线头影测量[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2004,42(4):466-468. 被引量:3
  • 2童学荣,缪耀强,李兰超,徐红红,区运运,王丛智.150名广东正常合人的X线头影测量研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1994,29(2):123-123. 被引量:7
  • 3吴军,钱玉芬,李宗鳌.错患者β角的临床评价[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2005,14(3):131-133. 被引量:3
  • 4Steiner C C. Cephalometrics for you and me [ J ]. Am J Orthod, 1953,39:729.
  • 5Zentner A, Doll GM, Peylo SM. Morphological parameters as predictors of successful correction of Class IIl malocclusion [ J ]. Eur J Orthod ,2001,23 (4) :383 - 392.
  • 6Jeffery DJ , Nathan SK. Ossification and midline shape changes of human fetal cranial base[ J]. Am J Physical Anthropology , 2004 , 123(1) :78 - 93.
  • 7Riedel R A.The relation of maxillary structures to craniuminmalocclusion and in normal occlusion[J].Angle Orthod,1952,22:142-145.
  • 8Jacobson A.The"Wits"appraisal of jaw disharmony[J].Am J Orthod,1975,67:125-138.
  • 9Baik C Y,Ververidou M.A new approach of assessing sagittaldiscrepancies:the Beta angle[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,2004,126(1):100-105.
  • 10Balk CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The Beta angle [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2004,126(1) : 100 - 105.

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部