期刊文献+

南北自由贸易协定的主要议题分析

下载PDF
导出
摘要 南北自由贸易谈判中的互惠原则一直受到批评。与WTO的现有规范相比,南北自由贸易协定在市场准入、政府采购、服务、投资、知识产权和竞争政策等领域超越了WTO的规定,对发展中国家的发展具有相当的不利影响。因此,发展中国家在进行自由贸易谈判时应当保持谨慎与小心,不仅要考虑市场开放带来的进出口和外来直接投资增加的影响,也要考虑这些贸易协定对他们追求更长时期的发展目标而采取其他政策与手段的选择权的影响。
作者 何树全
出处 《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》 2008年第12期1-6,13,共7页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
基金 国家社科基金项目(批准号:05BJL049) 上海市高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金项目(编号:17054) 上海大学文科“跨越”发展基金项目(编号:07KYY009)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1何树全.NAFTA投资争端解决机制:实践、问题与建议[J].贵州财经学院学报,2005(3):79-83. 被引量:4
  • 2何树全.国际投资协定中的主要争议和未来的选择分析[J].社会科学,2004(5):25-32. 被引量:4
  • 3Anson J,Olivier Cadot,Antoni Estevadeordal,et al."Rules of origin in North-South preferential trading arrangements with an application to NAFTA’s"[].ReviewofInternational Economics.2005
  • 4Cernat L,Onguglo B,Ito T.RTAs and WTO compatibility:Catch me if you can?The case of EPA negotiations[].GTAP Resource.2007
  • 5European Commission.Development relations with African,Asian and Pacific States:The Cotonou A-greement. http://ec.europa.eu/development/Geographical/Cotonou/Cotonou2000_en.cfm . 2000
  • 6Scollay R.“Substantially all trade”:Which definitions are fulfilled in practice?An empirical investiga-tion. http://www.thecommonwealth.org/shared_asp_files/uploaded-files/ECFD8065-9E2C-425E-AEE3-D7ECBDC330DC_Substanially-alltrade.pdf . 2005
  • 7Singh A.Competition and competition policy on emerging markets:International and developmental di-mensions[].G-Discussion Paper.2002
  • 8UNCTAD.Trade and Development Report[]..2006
  • 9UNCTAD.Trade and Development Report[]..2007
  • 10WTO.Annex1A to Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization:Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods. http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/legal_e.htm . 1994

二级参考文献24

  • 1UNCTAD. 1999, World Investment Report 1999 [R].Geneva.
  • 2UNCTAD, 2003, World Investment Report 2003 [R]. Geneva.
  • 3WTO. 2001. Ministerial Declaration [R]. Nov. 14, 2001, WT/MIN (01) /DEC/I.
  • 4UNCITRAL, Pope and Talbot Interim Award, June 26, 2000http ://www. dfait - maeci. gc. ca/tna - nac/documents/pubdoc7. pdf.
  • 5UNCITRAL, Pope and Talbot Award on Preliminary Motion by the Government of Canada, January 26,2000 http ://www. dfait - maeci.gc. ca/tna - nac/pubdoc7. pdf.
  • 6UNCITRAL, S. D. Myers final Award, December 30, 2002http ://www. dfait - maeci. gc. ca/tna - nac/documents/MyersFinal Award - Final - 30 - 12 - 02. pdf.
  • 7Secretariat of NAFTA( 1992 ) , North America Free Trade Agreement, December, 1992 http ://www. nafta - sec - alena. org/english/index. htm.
  • 8Jones, Ray (2002) NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor - to - State Dispute Resolution: A Shield to Be Embraced or a Sword to Be Feared?Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2002 Issue 2.
  • 9Strazzeri, Joseph A. (2002), A Lucas Analysis of Regulatory Expropriations Under NAFTA Chapter Eleven, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Summer2002, Vol. 14 Issue 4.
  • 10Mcllroy, James (2001), Private Investment Claims Against States And Provinces - The Impact Of NAFTA Chapter 11, Canada - United States Law Journal; 2001, Vol. 27.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部