审美教育质疑

Queries to Theory of Education of Aesthetic Appreciation

美育即审美教育的观点,从术语到论述,从认识到实践,它都名不副实,以偏概全,在"美育"和"审美教育"两个概念之间犯了内涵不明,外延不清,判断失真的逻辑错误。更主要,美育一旦只讲审美而不讲创美,或者只讲精神创美而不讲物质创美,就有可能背离美育的实践本质,从而失去教学相长的创新精神,严重影响师生个性自由的全面发展。

There have always been various opinions about the nature of aesthetic education all ages. The standpoint that aesthetic education is education of aesthetic appreciation is something through the more in the name than in reality in the aspects from the term to exposition and from knowledge to practice. Seeing the wood for the trees, it made such logical mistakes as both of the intensions and extensions of the two conceptions ＂aesthetic education＂ and ＂education of aesthetic appreciation＂ which are not clear and the judgments lack the truth. More importantly, when we discuss about aesthetic education, if we emphasize only aesthetic appreciation and ignore aesthetic creation or emphasize only mental aesthetic creation and ignore the material aesthetic creation, we may deviate from the practical essence of aesthetic education. In this way, we may lose the innovational spirit of mutual facilitation for the both of aspects of teaching and learning, and impede seriously the free development of the teachers and students＇ individuality in an all round way.