期刊文献+

文件筐测验中评分者信度的误差分析 被引量:1

Error analysis of inter-rater reliability in in-basket test
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨文件筐测验中评分者信度的影响因素。方法培训程度不同的2组评分者采用2种方法对代表2个复杂程度不同的能力试题评分,运用概化理论分析评分者信度差异。结果复杂能力用分析法较好(p、r、pr变异分量估计值为0.743,0.014,0.395);用分析法评价复杂能力时,低培训组的评分(Ep25=0.8519,Ф5=0.8519)最接近高培训组的评分(E025=0.9039,Ф5:0.9010)。结论方法因素与评估内容的交互作用对评分者信度有影响。 Objective The research discusses the factors which to affect the inter-rater reliability in inbasket test. Methods Raters who belong to 2 different-trained-degree groups mark the same items using Degree Marking Method and Taking-out Marking Method. These items represent 2 different complexity degrees. The research adopt the generalizability theory to analyze the inter-rater reliability. Results For marking the complex ability, taking-out marking method was better( estimated value of p, r, pr was 0. 743,0. 014,0.395 respectively). The mark of less trained group ( Ep25 = 0.8519, Ф5 = 0.8519 ) was similar to the well trained group' s ( Ep25 = 0. 9039, Ф5 = 0.9010), when adopting taking-out marking method to assess the complex ability. Conclusion The interaction between the method factors and the complexity of the ability may affect the inter-rater reliability.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2008年第12期1133-1134,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 评分者信度 影响因素 概化理论 Inter-rater reliability Affecting factors Generalizability theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Penny J, Johnson LR, Gordon B. The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability A empirical study of a holistic rubric. Assessing Writing,2000,7 : 143-164.
  • 2Breland H. The direct assessment of writing skill: a measurement review. Princeton, NJ : College Entrance Examination Board, 1983:3-6.
  • 3Huot B. The literature of direct writing assessment: major concerns and prevailing trends. Review of Educational Research, 1990, 60:237-263.
  • 4Linn RL,Burton E. Perforrmnce based assessment:Imphcations of task specificity. Educational Measurement :Issues and Practice,1994,11:3- 9.
  • 5严芳,李伟明.用结构方程建模(SEM)估计概化理论(GT)中的评分者信度[J].心理学报,2002,34(5):534-539. 被引量:12

二级参考文献10

  • 1Zheng R C, Cai Y H, Zhou Y Q. Psychological Measurement (in Chinese). Beijing: People Education Press,1999(郑日昌,蔡永红,周益群.心理测量.北京:人民教育出版社,1999)
  • 2Shavelson R J, Webb N M. Generalizability Theory: A Primer. In: Jaeger R M. Measurement Methods for the Social Sciences Series. Sage Publications,INC.1991
  • 3Brennan R L. (Mis)Conceptions About Generalizability Theory. EM:IP, Spring 2000(1):5~10
  • 4Neter J, Kutner M H, Nachtsheim C J, Asserman W W. Applied Linear Statistical Models (4th ed).IRWIN, Chicago.1996
  • 5Shavelson R J, Webb N M. Generalizability Theory:1973-1980.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,1981,34:133~166
  • 6Marcoulides G A. Estimating Variance Components in Generali-zability Theory: The Covariance Structure Analysis Approach. Structural Equation Modeling , 1996,3(3), 290~299
  • 7Wang S G. Theory and application of Linear Statistical Models (in Chinese). Anhui: Anhui Education Press,1986(王松桂.线性模型原理与应用.安徽:安徽教育出版社,1986)
  • 8Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S. Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). Haper Collins College Publisbers, 1996
  • 9Dunn G, Everitt B, Pickles A. Modelling Covariances and Latent Variables Using EQS. London: Chapman & Hall, 1993
  • 10Embretson S E, Hershberger S L. The New Rules of Measurement. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,1999

共引文献11

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部