摘要
目的探讨速尿不同给药方式对液体过负荷危重患者脱水效果的影响。方法将63例液体过负荷危重患者按入院日单双号分速尿持续给药组33例、速尿间断给药组30例,分别观察两组患者的速尿用量和24 h尿量。结果两组24 h尿量差异无统计学意义,间断给药组速尿使用量明显高于持续给药组。结论对危重患者实施脱水治疗,速尿持续给药比间断给药更加有效。
Objective To study the effect of furosemide on dehydration for critical patients with liquid overload in different administrations and nursing observation. Method Divide 63 critical patients with fluid overload into continious administration furosemide group (n = 33) and intermittent administration furosemide group (n = 30) according to hospitalizing date. Observe the dosage of furosemide and the volume of urine output in 24h of the two groups. Result There is no significant difference between the urine volume of the two groups. But the dosage of furosemide in intermittent administration furosemide group is obviously higher than that in continious administration furosemide group. Conclusion Continious administration of furosemide is more effective than intermittent of administration on dehydration for critical patients.
出处
《护理与康复》
2008年第12期891-893,共3页
Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation
关键词
液体过负荷
速尿
持续给药
间断给药
Fluid overload
Furosemide
Continious administration
Intermittent administration