期刊文献+

论惩罚性违约金的合理性——从体系化的视角评析我国合同法114条 被引量:4

Discussing on the Rationality of Punitive Penalty——A systematic-viewpoint evaluation on article 114 of Chinese Contract Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行合同法的违约金规则兼有赔偿性与惩罚性的内容,从而引起立法与司法实践的混乱,甚至使违约金规则常常被赔偿损失所取代。从体系化的视角出发,惩罚性的违约金更具有合理性。因此,惩罚性违约金的理念应该贯穿关于违约金的全部法律条文,废除体现赔偿性理念的法律条文,让守约方在违约金问题上具有进退自由的主动权而让违约方处于被动地位。 The simultaneity of contents of compensation and penalty stated by penalty rules in current Chinese Contract Law contributes to disturbance occured therefrom in legistlation and judicial practices, and even to replace of penalty rules with indemnity. Observed from a systematic viewpoint, penalty as a punishment, the notion reflecting of greater rationality, should be embedded in law provision concerning penalty while its counterparts of indemnity must be made obsolete. Such differentiation provides observant party with an initiative in penalty disputes, leaving the contract -breaker at unfavorable stage.
作者 刘文信
机构地区 仰恩大学法学系
出处 《兰州商学院学报》 2008年第6期96-103,共8页 Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College
关键词 体系化思维 违约金 惩罚性 systematic thought penalty punishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1梁慧星.论合同责任[J].学习与探索,1982(1):58-62. 被引量:12
  • 2陈学明.惩罚性违约金的比较研究(上)[J].比较法研究,1989,3(Z1):47-55. 被引量:21
  • 3[意]彼德罗·彭梵得 黄风 译.罗马法教科书[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992.253.
  • 4[日]能见善久.违约金、损害赔偿额的预定及其规制(5)[J].法学协会杂志,1986,(6):1000-1001,1000.
  • 5林咏荣.中国法制史[M].台北:自版,1976.144—145.
  • 6[日]奥田昌道.注释民法(10)[M].东京:有斐阁,1987.680,680—681,681—682,677,676,676—677,677,678,679.
  • 7[日]椿寿夫,右近健男.德国债权法总论[M].东京:日本评论社,1988.255.
  • 8[日]於保不二雄.债权总论(新版)[M].东京:有斐阁,1972.156.
  • 9[日]奥田昌道.债权总论(增补版)[M].东京:悠悠社,2000.216.
  • 10Alexander S. Komarov. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation: General Provisions on Liability for the Violation of Obligations. McGill Law Journal [J]. 1999, (44): 357, 365, 365, 366.

共引文献193

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部