摘要
目的探讨汉、维、哈三族中学生教养方式与应付方式的关系。方法对146名汉族、115名少数民族中学生进行教养方式(EMBU)及简易应付方式问卷(SCSQ)测试。结果1F1、F3、F4、M1、M2、M3、M5的民族差异显著;积极应付方式的民族差异不显著(F=2.170,P>0.05),而消极应付方式的民族差异显著(F=4.608,P<0.01);2F1与积极应付方式正相关(B=0.169),M2与消极应付方式呈正相关(B=0.157)。结论F1、F3、F4、M1、M2、M3、M5的民族差异显著;消极应付方式的民族差异显著;F1与积极应付方式正相关,M2与消极应付方式呈正相关。
Objective To explore the correlation between Parenting Styles and Coping Style in the nationalities of Chinese, Uigur and Kazak. Methods 146 Chinese students and 115 national minority students were investigated by using of the EMBU and SCSQ. Results ①In F1, F3, F4, M1, M2, M3, M5, there existed significant difference among different nationality; In the positive coping style, there were no difference for nationality (F= 2. 170, P〉0.05). In the negative coping style, there existed significant difference among nationality (F= 4. 608, P〈0.01). ②There existed much significant positive-correlations between positive coping style and F1 (B=0. 169), negative coping style and F2 (B=0. 157). Conclusion There existed significant difference for nationality in F1, F3, F4, M1, M2, M3, M5; In the negative coping style, there existed significant difference among nationality; There existed much significant positive-correlations between positive Coping Style and F1, negative Coping Style and F2.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2008年第12期1373-1375,共3页
China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词
中学生
教养方式
应付方式
High School Students
Parenting Styles
Coping Style